SynthesisIntensive care medicine2020
Prediction of poor neurological outcome in comatose survivors of cardiac arrest: a systematic review.
Synthesis in Intensive care medicine, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 165 papers, 12 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
165 citing papers in PubMed, 12 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 335 citations in OpenAlex.
- 2025 Korean Guidelines for Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation: Part 6. Post-cardiac arrest care.Clinical and experimental emergency medicine · 2026Guideline
- European Resuscitation Council and European Society of Intensive Care Medicine guidelines 2025: post-resuscitation care.Intensive care medicine · 2025Guideline
- Care pathways for individuals with post-anoxic disorder of consciousness (CaPIADoC): an inter-society Consensus Conference.Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2025Pooled it
- Myoclonus After Cardiac Arrest: Need for Standardization-A Systematic Review and Research Proposal on Terminology.Critical care medicine · 2025Pooled it
- Monitoring of Brain Tissue Oxygen Tension in Cardiac Arrest: a Translational Systematic Review from Experimental to Clinical Evidence.Neurocritical care · 2024Pooled it
- Electroencephalogram-based machine learning models to predict neurologic outcome after cardiac arrest: A systematic review.Resuscitation · 2024Pooled it
- Lower versus higher oxygen targets for out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Critical care (London, England) · 2023Pooled it
- Pooled it
- Temperature control after cardiac arrest.Critical care (London, England) · 2022Pooled it
- Prediction of good neurological outcome in comatose survivors of cardiac arrest: a systematic review.Intensive care medicine · 2022Pooled it
- Neurologic Prognostication After Cardiac Arrest Using Brain Biomarkers: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.JAMA neurology · 2022Pooled it
- EEG Patterns and Outcomes After Hypoxic Brain Injury: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.Neurocritical care · 2022Pooled it
- Neurofilament light chain for prognostication after cardiac arrest-first steps towards validation.Critical care (London, England) · 2025Trial
- Unreactive EEG Background Is Associated With Unfavorable Outcome in Patients With Disorders of Consciousness of Various Etiologies: An Adult Cohort Study.European journal of neurology · 2025Trial
- Trial
- Early risk stratification for progression to death by neurological criteria following out-of-hospital cardiac arrest.Resuscitation · 2022Trial
- Prognostic Significance of EEG Patterns in Post-Cardiac Arrest Coma: A Multicenter Retrospective Cohort Study of 1,000 Patients.Neurology open access · 2026Article
- Longitudinal Kinetics of Cerebrospinal Fluid and Serum S100B in Patients with Delayed Cerebral Ischemia After Aneurysmal Subarachnoid Hemorrhage.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Observational
- Neuroprognostication After Extracorporeal Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation: ECMO-Specific Challenges and a Multimodal Time-Sensitive Framework.Journal of cardiovascular development and disease · 2026Review
- Construction of a predictive nomogram for ICU mortality in patients with cardiac arrest using the MIMIC-IV database and the eICU Collaborative Research Database.BMC cardiovascular disorders · 2026Article
105 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors at 8 institutions in 6 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeTo assess the ability of clinical examination, blood biomarkers, electrophysiology, or neuroimaging assessed within 7 days from return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC) to predict poor neurological outcome, defined as death, vegetative state, or severe disability (CPC 3-5) at hospital discharge/1 month or later, in comatose adult survivors from cardiac arrest (CA).
methodsPubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews (January 2013-April 2020) were searched. Sensitivity and false-positive rate (FPR) for each predictor were calculated. Due to heterogeneities in recording times, predictor thresholds, and definition of some predictors, meta-analysis was not performed.
resultsNinety-four studies (30,200 patients) were included. Bilaterally absent pupillary or corneal reflexes after day 4 from ROSC, high blood values of neuron-specific enolase from 24 h after ROSC, absent N20 waves of short-latency somatosensory-evoked potentials (SSEPs) or unequivocal seizures on electroencephalogram (EEG) from the day of ROSC, EEG background suppression or burst-suppression from 24 h after ROSC, diffuse cerebral oedema on brain CT from 2 h after ROSC, or reduced diffusion on brain MRI at 2-5 days after ROSC had 0% FPR for poor outcome in most studies. Risk of bias assessed using the QUIPS tool was high for all predictors.
conclusionIn comatose resuscitated patients, clinical, biochemical, neurophysiological, and radiological tests have a potential to predict poor neurological outcome with no false-positive predictions within the first week after CA. Guidelines should consider the methodological concerns and limited sensitivity for individual modalities. (PROSPERO CRD42019141169).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.