Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32915023›Full record

ArticleThe American psychologist2020

Patient race and opioid misuse history influence provider risk perceptions for future opioid-related problems.

Adam T Hirsh, Tracy M Anastas, Megan M Miller, Patrick D Quinn, Kurt Kroenke

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The American psychologist, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
4.5field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 35 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Unconscious Bias among Health Professionals: A Scoping Review.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2023
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Adam T HirshDepartment of Psychology, Indiana University-Purdue University Indianapolis.
Tracy M AnastasDepartment of Psychology, Indiana University-Purdue University Indianapolis.
Megan M MillerDepartment of Psychology, Indiana University-Purdue University Indianapolis.ORCID 0000-0002-6222-2659
Patrick D QuinnDepartment of Applied Health Science, Indiana University, Bloomington.ORCID 0000-0002-6770-8762
Kurt KroenkeDepartment of Medicine, Indiana University School of Medicine.
Indiana University – Purdue University Indianapolis · USIndiana University Bloomington · USIndiana University School of Medicine

Funding

Virtual Perspective-Taking to Reduce Race and SES Disparities in Pain CareR01MD008931 · NIMHD · INDIANA UNIVERSITY INDIANAPOLIS · PI HIRSH, ADAM T · 2014 to 2018
$1.9M
NIH HHSNIMHD NIH HHS R01 MD008931
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In response to the dual public health crises of chronic pain and opioid use, providers have become more vigilant about assessing patients for risk of opioid-related problems. Little is known about how providers are making these risk assessments. Given previous studies indicating that Black patients are at increased risk for suboptimal pain care, which may be related to stereotypes about drug abuse, the current study examined how patient race and previous opioid misuse behaviors impact providers' risk assessments for future prescription opioid-related problems. Physician residents and fellows (N = 135) viewed videos and read vignettes about 8 virtual patients with chronic pain who varied by race (Black/White) and history of prescription opioid misuse (absent/present). Providers rated patients' risk for future prescription opioid-related adverse events, misuse/abuse, addiction, and diversion, and also completed measures of implicit racial attitudes and explicit beliefs about race differences in pain. Two significant interactions emerged indicating that Black patients were perceived to be at greater risk for future adverse events (when previous misuse was absent) and diversion (when previous misuse was present). Significant main effects indicated that Black patients and patients with previous misuse were perceived to be at greater risk for future misuse/abuse of prescription opioids, and that patients with previous misuse were perceived to be at greater risk of addiction. These findings suggest that racial minorities and patients with a history of prescription opioid misuse are particularly vulnerable to any unintended consequences of efforts to stem the dual public health crises of chronic pain and opioid use. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2020 APA, all rights reserved).

Indexed as

Attitude of Health PersonnelAdultAnalgesics, OpioidBlack or African AmericanBlack PeopleFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedOpioid-Related DisordersPrescription Drug MisuseRace FactorsRisk FactorsUnited StatesWhite PeopleAnalgesics, Opioid

Identifiers

PMID32915023
PMCPMC7490831
OpenAlexW3085616550

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.