Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32914404›Full record

ArticleThe international journal of cardiovascular imaging2021

Diagnostic analysis of new quantitative parameters of low-dose dynamic myocardial perfusion imaging with CZT SPECT in the detection of suspected or known coronary artery disease.

Zekun Pang, Jiao Wang, Shuai Li, Yue Chen, Xiaojie Wang, Jianming Li

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The international journal of cardiovascular imaging, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. A new perspective on an old method: gated SPECT imaging for left ventricular contractile function assessment.Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology · 2023
    Article
  4. Measuring myocardial blood flow using dynamic myocardial perfusion SPECT: artifacts and pitfalls.Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology · 2023
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Zekun PangNuclear Medicine Department, Tianjin Medical University Clinical Cardiovascular Institute, TEDA International Cardiovascular Hospital, Tianjin, 300457, China.
Jiao WangNuclear Medicine Department, Tianjin Medical University Clinical Cardiovascular Institute, TEDA International Cardiovascular Hospital, Tianjin, 300457, China.
Shuai LiNuclear Medicine Department, Tianjin Medical University Clinical Cardiovascular Institute, TEDA International Cardiovascular Hospital, Tianjin, 300457, China.
Yue ChenNuclear Medicine Department, Tianjin Medical University Clinical Cardiovascular Institute, TEDA International Cardiovascular Hospital, Tianjin, 300457, China.
Xiaojie WangNuclear Medicine Department, Tianjin Medical University Clinical Cardiovascular Institute, TEDA International Cardiovascular Hospital, Tianjin, 300457, China.
Jianming LiNuclear Medicine Department, Tianjin Medical University Clinical Cardiovascular Institute, TEDA International Cardiovascular Hospital, Tianjin, 300457, China. ichlijm@163.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2585-4753

Funding

Key Project of Tianjin Health Commission, Tianjin, China 16KG145Tianjin Binhai Health Commission Science and Technology Project 2017BKWY025
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The goal of this study is to explore and evaluate the diagnostic values of myocardial blood flow (MBF), myocardial flow reserve (MFR) and relative flow reserve (RFR) obtained with low-dose dynamic CZT SPECT for patients with suspected or known coronary artery disease (CAD). Fifty-seven consecutive patients who underwent low-dose dynamic CZT SPECT and CAG were enrolled. MBF, MFR and RFR were calculated on the vessel level with dedicated quantitative software, and the difference and correlation of each parameter was compared according to the reference standard of stenosis ≥ 50% or ≥ 75% on CAG, respectively. ROC curves were made by stress MBF (sMBF), rest MBF (rMBF), MFR and RFR. The optimal cut-off values and corresponding diagnostic efficacy were obtained and compared with each other. Results indicated that when stenosis ≥ 50% or ≥ 75% on CAG was used as the reference standard at the vessel level, there was no statistically significant difference in rMBF between the negative group and the positive group (P > 0.05), and the sMBF and MFR in positive groups were significantly lower than that in the negative group (all P < 0.05). There was a moderate to significant correlation between sMBF and MFR, sMBF and RFR, MFR and RFR (all P < 0.0001). These results indicate that low-dose dynamic CZT SPECT imaging can easily obtain the sMBF, MFR and RFR, and there is a good correlation among the three parameters, which has a certain diagnostic value for patients with suspected or known CAD, and is a useful supplement to the conventional qualitative or semi-quantitative diagnostic methods.

Indexed as

CadmiumCoronary CirculationMyocardial Perfusion ImagingTelluriumTomography, Emission-Computed, Single-PhotonZincAgedCoronary Artery DiseaseCoronary StenosisCoronary VesselsFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPredictive Value of TestsRadiopharmaceuticalsCadmiumCdZnTeRadiopharmaceuticalsTechnetium Tc 99m SestamibiTelluriumZincCadmium zinc tellurium (CZT)Myocardial flow reserve (MFR)Myocardial perfusion imaging (MPI)Relative flow reserve (RFR)Single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT)

Identifiers

PMID32914404
PMCPMC7878253

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.