Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32914375›Full record

ArticleQuality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation2021

Translation and validation of the Korean version of the Sarcopenia Quality of Life (SarQoL-K®) questionnaire and applicability with the SARC-F screening tool.

Jun-Il Yoo, Yong-Chan Ha, Miji Kim, Sung-Hyo Seo, Mi-Ji Kim, Gyeong-Ye Lee, Young-Mi Seo, Changsu Sung, Ki-Soo Park

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Analysis of Structural Characteristics and Psychometric Properties of the SarQoLInternational journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Validation of the German version of the SarQoLAging clinical and experimental research · 2024
    Article
  8. Evaluating the SarQoLHealthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Jun-Il YooDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Gyeongsang National University Hospital, Jinju, Korea.
Yong-Chan HaDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Chung-Ang University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
Miji KimCollege of Medicine/East-West Medical Research Institute, Kyung Hee University, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Sung-Hyo SeoDepartment of Information & Statistics, College of Natural Science, Gyeongsang National University, Jinju, Republic of Korea.
Mi-Ji KimCenter for Farmer's Safety and Health, Gyeongsang National University Hospital, Jinju, Republic of Korea.
Gyeong-Ye LeeCenter for Farmer's Safety and Health, Gyeongsang National University Hospital, Jinju, Republic of Korea.
Young-Mi SeoCenter for Farmer's Safety and Health, Gyeongsang National University Hospital, Jinju, Republic of Korea.
Changsu SungCenter for Farmer's Safety and Health, Gyeongsang National University Hospital, Jinju, Republic of Korea.
Ki-Soo ParkCenter for Farmer's Safety and Health, Gyeongsang National University Hospital, Jinju, Republic of Korea. parkks@gnu.ac.kr.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5571-3639

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe purpose of this paper was to translate and validate into the Korea language and setting the Sarcopenia Quality of Life (SarQoL®) questionnaire.

methodsThe participants consisted of 450 individuals in Namgaram-2 cohort who were followed up in 2019-2020. The study participants were divided into four groups: (1) SARC-F < 4, (2) SARC-F ≥ 4 and robust grip strength, (3) SARC-F ≥ 4, low grip strength, robust muscle mass, (4) SARC-F ≥ 4, low grip strength, and low muscle mass. To assess construct validity, population with sarcopenia-associated symptoms (SARC-F ≥ 4) apart from the Korean SarQoL (SarQoL-K®) completed the Korean versions of two generic questionnaires, the Short Form-36 and the EuroQoL 5-dimension. To validate the Korean SarQoL®, we assessed its validity (discriminative power, construct validity), reliability (internal consistency, test-retest reliability), and floor/ceiling effects.

resultsThe SarQoL-K® questionnaire was translated without major difficulties. The mean SarQoL-K scores were 72.9 (95%, CI; 71.2-74.6) in SARC-F < 4, 54.6 (95%, CI; 50.7-58.3) in SARC-F ≥ 4 and robust grip strength, 47.0 (95%, CI; 43.8-50.1) in SARC-F ≥ 4, low grip strength, robust muscle mass, 46.6 (95%, CI; 43.0-50.1) in SARC-F ≥ 4, low grip strength, and low muscle mass. The results indicated good discriminative power across each four groups (p < 0.001), high internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha of 0.866), and excellent test-retest reliability (ICC = 0.977, 95% CI 0.975-0.979). No floor- or ceiling-effects were observed.

conclusionsThis is the first study to confirm the reliability and validity of the Korean version of the SarQoL®. We demonstrated that the population with sarcopenia-associated symptoms (determined using the SARC-F questionnaire) has a lower quality of life.

Indexed as

AgedFemaleHumansLanguageMaleMass ScreeningQuality of LifeReproducibility of ResultsRepublic of KoreaSarcopeniaSurveys and QuestionnairesTranslationsCross cultural adaptationKoreaQuality of lifeSarcopenia

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.