Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32914347›Full record

ArticleHeart and vessels2021

Safety, effectiveness and mid-term follow-up in 136 consecutive patients with moderate to severely calcified lesions undergoing phoenix atherectomy.

Sorin Giusca, Michael Lichtenberg, Melanie Schueler, Ulrike Heinrich, Christoph Eisenbach, Martin Andrassy, Grigorios Korosoglou

Erratum issuedAbstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Heart and vessels, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Phoenix atherectomy for patients with peripheral artery disease.EuroIntervention : journal of EuroPCR in collaboration with the Working Group on Interventional Cardiology of the European Society of Cardiology · 2022
    Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Sorin GiuscaCardiology and Vascular Medicine, GRN Hospital Weinheim, Weinheim, Germany.
Michael LichtenbergVascular Center Klinikum Arnsberg, Arnsberg, Germany.
Melanie SchuelerPractice for Cardiology and Vascular Medicine, Hirschberg, Germany.
Ulrike HeinrichPractice for Vascular Medicine and Gastroenterology, Weinheim, Germany.
Christoph EisenbachDiabetology and Gastroenterology, GRN Hospital Weinheim, Weinheim, Germany.
Martin AndrassyFuerst-Stirum Hospital, Cardiology and Vascular Medicine, Bruchsal, Germany.
Grigorios KorosoglouCardiology and Vascular Medicine, GRN Hospital Weinheim, Weinheim, Germany. gkorosoglou@hotmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6038-2253
Gerresheimer (Germany) · DEKlinikum Arnsberg · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

To investigate the safety and effectiveness of the Phoenix atherectomy device for the treatment of complex and calcified lesions in patients with peripheral artery disease (PAD). 136 consecutive all-comer patients with chronic PAD underwent Phoenix atherectomy. Safety in terms of vessel injury and embolism, efficacy and clinical success in terms of ≥ 1Rutherford class (RF) improvement during follow-up were systematically analyzed. Lesion calcification was categorized by the Peripheral Arterial Calcium Scoring System (PACSS), whereas lesion complexity was classified by the Transatlantic Inter-Society Consensus (TASC). 151 lesions were treated in 136 consecutive patients. Clinical follow-up was available at 10.3 ± 4.2 months in 132 (97%) patients. 55 patients (40%) had intermittent claudication, 16 (12%) rest pain and 65 (48%) had ischemic ulcerations (mean RF class = 4.2 ± 1.1). 15 (11%) patients had TASC B lesions, whereas the majority 72 (53%) and 49 (36%) exhibited TASC C and D lesions, respectively. Mean PACSS score was 3.3 ± 0.9. Mean lesion length was 106 ± 92 mm. Atherectomy was combined with drug-coated balloon (DCB) in 129 (95%) patients. Nine (6.6%) patients with infra-inguinal lesions received stents. Technical and procedural success were recorded in 102 (75%) and 135 (99%), respectively. Perforation was noticed in 2 (1%), whereas asymptomatic embolism occurred in 6 (4%) patients. Clinical success was present in 54 (100%) patients with claudication and in 65 of 78 (83%) patients with critical limb ischemia (CLI). Atherectomy in combination with DCB angioplasty can be safely performed in patients with complex, calcified peripheral lesions with a relatively low rate of bail-out stenting and promising clinical mid-term results.German Clinical Trials Register: DRKS00016708.

Indexed as

Coated Materials, BiocompatibleFemoral ArteryPopliteal ArteryAgedAngiographyAngioplasty, BalloonAtherectomyFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansMalePeripheral Arterial DiseaseProspective StudiesSeverity of Illness IndexStentsTime FactorsCoated Materials, BiocompatibleClaudicationCritical limb ischemiaDuplex sonographyLower limbRotational atherectomy

Identifiers

PMID32914347
OpenAlexW3084573578

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.