Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32914342›Full record

ReviewAttention, perception & psychophysics2021

Neural mechanism of priming in visual search.

Jacob A Westerberg, Jeffrey D Schall

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Attention, perception & psychophysics, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Contributions of Distinct Attention Mechanisms to Saccadic Choices in a Gamified, Dynamic Environment.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Inversion of pop-out for a distracting feature dimension in monkey visual cortex.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2023
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Jacob A WesterbergDepartment of Psychology, Center for Integrative and Cognitive Neuroscience, Vanderbilt Vision Research Center, College of Arts and Sciences, Vanderbilt University, 111 21st Avenue South, Nashville, TN, 37240, USA. jacob.a.westerberg@vanderbilt.edu.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5331-8707
Jeffrey D SchallDepartment of Psychology, Center for Integrative and Cognitive Neuroscience, Vanderbilt Vision Research Center, College of Arts and Sciences, Vanderbilt University, 111 21st Avenue South, Nashville, TN, 37240, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5248-943X

Funding

Shop Module CoreP30EY008126 · NEI · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER · PI David J. Calkins · 1989 to 2026
$19.6M
Overall: Eunice Kennedy Shriver Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities Research Center at VanderbiltP50HD103537 · NICHD · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER · PI Jeffrey L Neul · 2020 to 2026
$10.3M
SACCADE TARGET SELECTION-FRONTAL CORTEXR01EY008890 · NEI · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY · PI WOODMAN, GEOFFREY F · 1991 to 2018
$7.4M
Research Project: Sensory and Multisensory Contributions to AutismU54HD083211 · NICHD · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER · PI DYKENS, ELISABETH MAY · 2015 to 2019
$7.1M
Training in Vision ResearchT32EY007135 · NEI · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY · PI GEOFFREY F WOODMAN · 1994 to 2026
$5.8M
Visual Event-Related Potentials: Comparative ElectrophysiologyR01EY019882 · NEI · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY · PI WOODMAN, GEOFFREY F · 2010 to 2020
$4.0M
Contributions of prefrontal and extrastriate cortex to the event-related potential index of attentionF31EY031293 · NEI · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY · PI WESTERBERG, JACOB ALAN · 2020 to 2021
$60k
Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development U54HD083211NEI NIH HHS F31 EY031293NEI NIH HHS P30 EY008126NEI NIH HHS R01 EY008890NEI NIH HHS R01 EY019882NEI NIH HHS T32 EY007135NEI NIH HHS T32EY007135NICHD NIH HHS P50 HD103537NICHD NIH HHS U54 HD083211
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Selective attention affords scrutinizing items in our environment. However, attentional selection changes over time and across space. Empirically, repetition of visual search conditions changes attentional processing. Priming of pop-out is a vivid example. Repeatedly searching for the same pop-out search feature is accomplished with faster response times and fewer errors. We review the psychophysical background of priming of pop-out, focusing on the hypothesis that it arises through changes in visual selective attention. We also describe research done with macaque monkeys to understand the neural mechanisms supporting visual selective attention and priming of pop-out, and survey research on priming of pop-out using noninvasive brain measures with humans. We conclude by hypothesizing three alternative neural mechanisms and highlighting open questions.

Indexed as

AttentionPattern Recognition, VisualHumansReaction TimeRepetition PrimingVisual PerceptionAttention: Neural mechanismsPrimingVisual search

Identifiers

PMID32914342
PMCPMC7886967

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.