Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32914334›Full record

ArticleDemography2020

Marriage and Union Formation in the United States: Recent Trends Across Racial Groups and Economic Backgrounds.

Deirdre Bloome, Shannon Ang

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Demography, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
20.8field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 121 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Marriage, Wealth, and the Spread of Cohabitation in Canada.The British journal of sociology · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Marital status, brain health, and cognitive reserve among diverse older adults.Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society : JINS · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. The Rising Midlife First Marriage Rate in the U.S.Journal of marriage and the family · 2022
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.

Deirdre BloomeDepartment of Sociology, Population Studies Center, and Survey Research Center, University of Michigan, 426 Thompson Street, Ann Arbor, MI, 48106, USA. dbloome@umich.edu.
Shannon AngDepartment of Sociology, Population Studies Center, and Survey Research Center, University of Michigan, 426 Thompson Street, Ann Arbor, MI, 48106, USA.
University of Michigan–Ann Arbor · US

Funding

Family Dynamics, Fertility, and Investments in Children Across Generations - Administrative SupplementR01HD069609 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI Thomas Fraser Crossley · 2011 to 2026
$14.2M
Population Studies Center Infrastructure GrantR24HD041028 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI SMOCK, PAMELA J. · 2001 to 2016
$13.2M
Transition to Adulthood within its Life Course & Intergenerational Family ContextP01HD087155 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI SASTRY, NARAYAN · 2016 to 2020
$6.5M
Scientific/Technical CoreP2CHD041028 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI Brady T West · 2017 to 2026
$6.5M
NICHD NIH HHS P01 HD087155NICHD NIH HHS P2C HD041028NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD069609NICHD NIH HHS R24 HD041028
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Family formation in the United States has changed dramatically: marriage has become less common, nonmarital cohabitation has become more common, and racial and economic inequalities in these experiences have increased. We provide insights into recent U.S. trends by presenting cohort estimates for people born between 1970 and 1997, who began forming unions between 1985 and 2015. Using Panel Study of Income Dynamics data, we find that typical ages at marriage and union formation increased faster across these recent cohorts than across cohorts born between 1940 and 1969. As fewer people married at young ages, more cohabited, but the substitution was incomplete. We project steep declines in the probability of ever marrying, declines that are larger among Black people than White people. We provide novel information on the intergenerational nature of family inequalities by measuring parental income, wealth, education, and occupational prestige. Marriage declines are particularly steep among people from low-income backgrounds. Black people are overrepresented in this low-income group because of discrimination and opportunity denial. However, marriage declines are larger among Black people than White people across parental incomes. Further, most racial differences in marriage occur among people from similar socioeconomic backgrounds. Family inequalities increasingly reflect both economic inequalities and broader racial inequalities generated by racist structures; in turn, family inequalities may prolong these other inequalities across generations.

Indexed as

AgedAge FactorsFamily CharacteristicsFemaleHumansIntergenerational RelationsMaleMarriageMiddle AgedSocioeconomic FactorsUnited StatesCohabitationIncome inequalityMarriageRacial inequality

Identifiers

PMID32914334
PMCPMC7907839
OpenAlexW3085290808

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.