Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32914235›Full record

SynthesisNeurosurgical review2021

Olfactory outcomes after endonasal skull base surgery: a systematic review.

Junhao Zhu, Kaiyang Feng, Chao Tang, Jin Yang, Xiangming Cai, Chunyu Zhong, Chiyuan Ma

Abstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Neurosurgical review, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Middle turbinate preservation versus resection during endoscopic sinus surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis.European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery · 2026
    Pooled it
  2. Partial Middle Turbinate Resection Versus Preservation on Olfactory Function: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Journal of otolaryngology - head & neck surgery = Le Journal d'oto-rhino-laryngologie et de chirurgie cervico-faciale
    Pooled it
  3. Changes in olfactory function and olfactory bulb after treatment for acromegaly.European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery · 2021
    Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Effect of endoscopic endonasal skull base approaches on olfactory function and facial development in children.Child's nervous system : ChNS : official journal of the International Society for Pediatric Neurosurgery · 2024
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Effects of Endoscopic Sinus Surgery on Olfactory Function.Current allergy and asthma reports · 2023
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Junhao Zhu *Jinling Hospital, School of Medicine, Nanjing Medical University, 104 Hanzhong Road, Nanjing, 210002, China.
Kaiyang Feng *Arkansas College of Health Education, 7000 Chad Colley Blvd, Fort Smith, AR, 72916, USA.
Chao TangDepartment of Neurosurgery, Jinling Hospital, School of Medicine, Nanjing University, 305 East Zhongshan Road, Nanjing, 210002, China.
Jin YangJinling Hospital, School of Medicine, Nanjing Medical University, 104 Hanzhong Road, Nanjing, 210002, China.
Xiangming CaiSchool of Medicine, Southeast University, Nanjing, 210009, China.
Chunyu ZhongJinling Hospital, School of Medicine, Nanjing Medical University, 104 Hanzhong Road, Nanjing, 210002, China.
Chiyuan MaJinling Hospital, School of Medicine, Nanjing Medical University, 104 Hanzhong Road, Nanjing, 210002, China. machiyuan_nju@126.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1710-5955

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

For the last two decades, endonasal approach has been regularly applied to treat skull base lesions. However, postoperative olfactory dysfunction remains an unsolved problem. This systematic review aimed to identify factors that might affect postoperative olfactory prognosis of patients undergoing endonasal surgery for resection of sellar/parasellar lesions. The literature search was conducted comprehensively to exhaust studies which focused on patients' olfaction with objective olfactory assessments after endonasal skull base surgery. We sought to characterize the potential factors that might affect postoperative olfactory outcomes. Nineteen articles met inclusion criteria. We found that (1) endoscopic surgery was beneficial to patients' olfactory prognosis than microscopic surgery (incidence of postoperative decreased olfactory function: 18.48% (39/211) for the endoscopic group and 36.88% (52/141) for the microscopic group, P < 0.01); meta-analysis for single rate, 20% (95% CI 9-30%) for the endoscopic group and 35% (95% CI 0-72%) for the microscopic group); (2) harvesting septal flaps was an unfavorable factor for olfactory recovery and the rescue flap technique should be preferred compared with the HB flap; (3) no evidence showed that resection of the middle turbinate was detrimental to recovery of olfaction. Patients undergoing endoscopic endonasal surgery may have better olfactory outcomes than those undergoing microscopic endonasal surgery for resection of sellar/parasellar lesions. Special attention should be paid when using septal flaps is planned and the rescue flap technique should be the preferred choice. After resecting the middle turbinate, patients' olfaction still has a great chance of returning to the baseline. More homogeneous and high-quality studies are needed for further assessment.

Indexed as

Olfaction DisordersSkull BaseSmellEndoscopyHumansPostoperative ComplicationsRetrospective StudiesSurgical FlapsEndonasal surgeryOlfactionSkull base lesions

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.