ReviewInternational orthopaedics2021
Computer assistance in hip preservation surgery-current status and introduction of our system.
Review in International orthopaedics, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.
- Open-source navigation system for tracking dissociated parts with multi-registration.International journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery · 2023Article
- [Persistent or recurrent symptoms after surgery for femoroacetabular impingement syndrome (FAIS) : Pathology, diagnostics and therapy].Orthopadie (Heidelberg, Germany) · 2022Review
- Accuracy and reliability analysis of a machine learning based segmentation tool for intertrochanteric femoral fracture CT.Frontiers in surgery · 2022Article
- Zhongguo xiu fu chong jian wai ke za zhi = Zhongguo xiufu chongjian waike zazhi = Chinese journal of reparative and reconstructive surgery · 2021Article
- Central and Eastern Europe actual orthopaedics profile.International orthopaedics · 2021Article
- Bony landmarks, distances and their correlations to each other, which can be used during periacetabular osteotomy: a CT study performed on dysplastic hips.Journal of hip preservation surgery · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionPreservation surgery of the hip with open or arthroscopic approach has always been challenging as complex 3-D anatomy and limited surgical access make intraoperative evaluation difficult. Recent advances in computer technology offer a wide range of innovative solutions with a goal to improve accuracy and safety of corrective procedures on human joints.
methodThe author critically reviews currently available literature in the field of computer assistance in hip preservation surgery. Basic features of unique planning software and navigation surgical system used in treatment of femoroacetabular impingement and hip dysplasia are introduced.
resultsCurrently available software provides preoperative identification of hip deformity on CT-based 3-D model and planning of the surgical correction using kinematic protocols. Real-time intraoperative 3-D orientation is possible, and execution of surgical correction can be performed either with navigation of surgical tools or with printed templates. Computer assistance in hip preservation surgery is in the developing phase. First clinical experiences of its use in treatment of femoroacetabular impingement, hip dysplasia, hip tumors, and avascular necrosis of the femoral head are promising.
conclusionComputer assistance has been applied for treatment of several hip disorders. Technical advances are suggested and quality basic studies and clinical trials are encouraged for the novel technology to become more user friendly and widely accepted.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.