Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32914116›Full record

ArticleCurrent research in food science2020

Techno-functional characterization of indigenous

Sujit Das, Birendra Kumar Mishra, Subrota Hati

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Current research in food science, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.3field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 32 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Genomic and probiotic attributes ofJournal of food science and technology · 2023
    Article
  13. Current research in food science · 2023
    Article
  14. Evaluation of the Probiotic Potential ofPolish journal of microbiology · 2022
    Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Sujit DasDepartment of Rural Development and Agricultural Production, North- Eastern Hill University, Tura Campus, Tura, 794 001, Meghalaya, India.
Birendra Kumar MishraDepartment of Rural Development and Agricultural Production, North- Eastern Hill University, Tura Campus, Tura, 794 001, Meghalaya, India.
Subrota HatiDepartment of Dairy Microbiology, S.M.C College of Dairy Science, Anand Agricultural University, Anand, 388 110, Gujarat, India.
North Eastern Hill University · INAnand Agricultural University · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The rural tribal people of Meghalaya depend mostly on their ethnic fermented foods as a part of their regular diet and these fermented foods are considered to be a hub of healthy microorganisms. However, the efficacy of probiotic microorganisms is considered to be population-specific because of gut microflora variation in food habits and specific host-microbial interactions. Hence, a strong need for exploring novel indigenous microorganisms with rich probiotic potentiality is required. A few indigenous

Indexed as

FermentationFermented foodsLactobacillusMeghalayaProbiotics

Identifiers

PMID32914116
PMCPMC7473377
OpenAlexW3021632022

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.