Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32914094›Full record

ArticleHawai'i journal of health & social welfare2020

Survival Analysis of Patient Contraceptive Choice Method at Time of Abortion - Honolulu, Hawai'i, May 2010-December 2016.

Kristen Valencia, Ghazaleh Moayedi, Shandhini Raidoo, Reni Soon, Bliss Kaneshiro, Mary Tschann

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Hawai'i journal of health & social welfare, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Kristen ValenciaOffice of Public Health Studies, University of Hawai'i, Honolulu, HI (KV).
Ghazaleh MoayediDepartment of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Women's Health, John A. Burns School of Medicine, University of Hawai'i, Honolulu, HI (KV, GM, SR, RS, BK, MT).
Shandhini RaidooDepartment of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Women's Health, John A. Burns School of Medicine, University of Hawai'i, Honolulu, HI (KV, GM, SR, RS, BK, MT).
Reni SoonDepartment of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Women's Health, John A. Burns School of Medicine, University of Hawai'i, Honolulu, HI (KV, GM, SR, RS, BK, MT).
Bliss KaneshiroDepartment of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Women's Health, John A. Burns School of Medicine, University of Hawai'i, Honolulu, HI (KV, GM, SR, RS, BK, MT).
Mary TschannDepartment of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Women's Health, John A. Burns School of Medicine, University of Hawai'i, Honolulu, HI (KV, GM, SR, RS, BK, MT).

Funding

The Role of gp120 on Cardiovascular Disease in People Living with HIVU54MD007601 · NIMHD · UNIVERSITY OF HAWAII AT MANOA · PI Jerris Robert Hedges · 2017 to 2026
$59.5M
NIMHD NIH HHS U54 MD007601
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The relationship between contraceptive method choice at the time of abortion and risk for subsequent abortions is not well understood. This article uses an existing data set from the University of Hawai'i Women's Options Center between May 2010 and December 2016 to examine if such a relationship exists. A multivariate Cox proportional hazards regression survival analysis was used to evaluate contraceptive method prescribed or provided at index abortion encounters and likelihood of additional abortions. Patients who received a prescription of oral contraceptive pills, patches or rings at their index abortion were 61% more likely to have an additional abortion than those who had no contraceptive method recorded (hazard ratio [HR], 1.61; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.14-2.28). Patients who received a long-acting reversible contraceptive method at their index abortion were 59% less likely to have an additional abortion when compared with a patient receiving no method (HR, 0.41; 95% CI, 0.20-0.86). The findings show that patients who were prescribed oral contraceptives pills, patches, or rings were more likely than patients who had no contraceptive method prescribed or provided to have more than one abortion during the data collection period. Contraceptive method choice at time of abortion is complex and providers should be thorough in their counseling about failure rates, while also remaining vigilant in supporting patient autonomy and avoiding coercive or stigmatizing language.

Indexed as

Abortion, InducedContraceptionContraceptives, Oral, CombinedFemaleHawaiiHumansPregnancySurvival AnalysisContraceptives, Oral, Combinedabortioncontraceptionreproductive autonomysurvival analysis

Identifiers

PMID32914094
PMCPMC7477704

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.