Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32914028›Full record

ArticleJCO precision oncology2020

Application of Circulating Cell-Free Tumor DNA Profiles for Therapeutic Monitoring and Outcome Prediction in Genetically Heterogeneous Metastatic Melanoma.

Renáta Váraljai, Kilian Wistuba-Hamprecht, Teofila Seremet, Joey Mark S Diaz, Jérémie Nsengimana, Antje Sucker, Klaus Griewank, Jan-Malte Placke, Peter A Horn, Nils von Neuhoff and 11 more

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JCO precision oncology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 38 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
38citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

38 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 52 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

21 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Renáta VáraljaiUniversity Hospital of Essen, University Duisburg-Essen and German Cancer Consortium partner site Essen/Düsseldorf, Essen, Germany.
Kilian Wistuba-HamprechtUniversity Medical Center Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany.
Teofila SeremetUniversitair Ziekenhuis Brussel and Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussels, Belgium.
Joey Mark S DiazLeeds Institute of Cancer and Pathology,University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.
Jérémie NsengimanaLeeds Institute of Cancer and Pathology,University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.
Antje SuckerUniversity Hospital of Essen, University Duisburg-Essen and German Cancer Consortium partner site Essen/Düsseldorf, Essen, Germany.
Klaus GriewankUniversity Hospital of Essen, University Duisburg-Essen and German Cancer Consortium partner site Essen/Düsseldorf, Essen, Germany.
Jan-Malte PlackeUniversity Hospital of Essen, University Duisburg-Essen and German Cancer Consortium partner site Essen/Düsseldorf, Essen, Germany.
Peter A HornUniversity Hospital of Essen, University Duisburg-Essen and German Cancer Consortium partner site Essen/Düsseldorf, Essen, Germany.
Nils von NeuhoffUniversity Hospital of Essen, University Duisburg-Essen and German Cancer Consortium partner site Essen/Düsseldorf, Essen, Germany.
Batool ShannanUniversity Hospital of Essen, University Duisburg-Essen and German Cancer Consortium partner site Essen/Düsseldorf, Essen, Germany.
Heike ChauvistréUniversity Hospital of Essen, University Duisburg-Essen and German Cancer Consortium partner site Essen/Düsseldorf, Essen, Germany.
Felix C E VogelUniversity Hospital of Essen, University Duisburg-Essen and German Cancer Consortium partner site Essen/Düsseldorf, Essen, Germany.
Susanne HornUniversity Hospital of Essen, University Duisburg-Essen and German Cancer Consortium partner site Essen/Düsseldorf, Essen, Germany.
Jürgen C BeckerUniversity Hospital of Essen, University Duisburg-Essen and German Cancer Consortium partner site Essen/Düsseldorf, Essen, Germany.
Julia Newton-BishopLeeds Institute of Cancer and Pathology,University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.
Andreas StangUniversity Hospital of Essen, University Duisburg-Essen and German Cancer Consortium partner site Essen/Düsseldorf, Essen, Germany.
Bart NeynsUniversitair Ziekenhuis Brussel and Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussels, Belgium.
Benjamin WeideUniversity Medical Center Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany.
Dirk SchadendorfUniversity Hospital of Essen, University Duisburg-Essen and German Cancer Consortium partner site Essen/Düsseldorf, Essen, Germany.
Alexander RoeschUniversity Hospital of Essen, University Duisburg-Essen and German Cancer Consortium partner site Essen/Düsseldorf, Essen, Germany.
Vrije Universiteit Brussel · BEDeutschen Konsortium für Translationale Krebsforschung · DEDüsseldorf University Hospital · DEUniversitair Ziekenhuis Brussel · BE

Funding

Cancer Research UK 11963Cancer Research UK 19167
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeCirculating cell-free tumor DNA (ctDNA) reflects the heterogeneous spectrum of tumor-specific mutations, especially in systemic disease. We validated plasma-based assays that allow the dynamic quantitative detection of ctDNA as a prognostic biomarker for tumor load and prediction of therapy response in melanoma. MATERIALS AND

methodsWe analyzed plasma-derived ctDNA from a large training cohort (n = 96) of patients with advanced-stage melanoma, with assays for the

resultsElevated plasma ctDNA level at baseline was an independent prognostic factor of disease progression when compared with serum S100 and lactate dehydrogenase levels in multivariable analyses (hazard ratio [HR], 7.43; 95% CI, 1.01 to 55.19;

conclusionOur results show the potential role of ctDNA measurement as a sensitive monitoring and prediction tool for the early assessment of disease progression and therapeutic response in patients with metastatic melanoma.

Identifiers

PMID32914028
PMCPMC7446476
OpenAlexW2913284903

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.