ArticleJCO precision oncology2019
Use of a Targeted Exome Next-Generation Sequencing Panel Offers Therapeutic Opportunity and Clinical Benefit in a Subset of Patients With Advanced Cancers.
Article in JCO precision oncology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
24 citing papers in PubMed.
- Pre-Analytical and Analytical Challenges in Whole-Exome Sequencing of Formalin-Fixed Paraffin-Embedded Breast and Prostate Cancer Tissue: A Real-World Multicenter Study.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- IDAP: an integrated literature- and knowledge-graph-driven evidence prioritization pipeline for precision oncology.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2026Article
- Review
- Biomarker Testing Approaches, Treatment Selection, and Cost of Care Among Adults With Advanced Cancer.JAMA network open · 2025Article
- The present and future of precision oncology and tumor-agnostic therapeutic approaches.The oncologist · 2025Review
- Feasibility and outcome of genomics-guided treatment selection in advanced cancer - the MEGALiT explorative clinical trial.Acta oncologica (Stockholm, Sweden) · 2025Article
- Real-World Data: Implementation and Outcomes of Next-Generation Sequencing in the MENA Region.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Advances in personalized medicine: translating genomic insights into targeted therapies for cancer treatment.Annals of translational medicine · 2025Review
- Clinical Utility of Liquid Biopsy for the Early Diagnosis of EGFR-Mutant Advanced Lung Cancer Patients in a Real-Life Setting (CLEAR Study).Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.) · 2025Article
- Discordance in Recommendation Between Next-Generation Sequencing Test Reports and Molecular Tumor Boards in India.JCO global oncology · 2024Article
- Comprehensive molecular profiling identifies actionable biomarkers for patients from Thailand and the United Arab Emirates with advanced malignancies.Frontiers in oncology · 2024Article
- The future of collaborative precision oncology approaches in sub-Saharan Africa: learnings from around the globe.Frontiers in oncology · 2024Article
- Comprehensive Review on the Clinical Impact of Next-Generation Sequencing Tests for the Management of Advanced Cancer.JCO precision oncology · 2023Review
- Feasibility of Comprehensive Genomic Profiling (CGP) in Real-Life Clinical Practice.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Cost Savings of Expedited Care with Upfront Next-Generation Sequencing Testing versus Single-Gene Testing among Patients with Metastatic Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Based on Current Canadian Practices.Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.) · 2023Article
- Clinically actionable genotypes for anticancer prescribing among >1500 patients with pharmacogenomic testing.Cancer · 2022Article
- Clinical and analytical validation of FoundationOne®CDx, a comprehensive genomic profiling assay for solid tumors.PloS one · 2022Article
- Article
- Current Status of Next-Generation Sequencing-Based Cancer Genome Profiling Tests in Japan and Prospects for Liquid Biopsy.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Article
- Rate of change in investigational treatment options: An analysis of reports from a large precision oncology decision support effort.International journal of medical informatics · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeSmaller hotspot-based next-generation sequencing (NGS) panels have emerged to support standard of care therapy for patients with cancer. When standard treatments fail, it is unknown whether additional testing using an expanded panel of genes provides any benefit. The purpose of this study was to determine if larger sequencing panels that capture additional actionable genes, coupled with decision support, translates into treatment with matched therapy after frontline therapy has failed. PATIENTS AND
methodsA prospective protocol accrued 521 patients with a wide variety of refractory cancers. NGS testing using a 46- or 50-gene hotspot assay, then a 409-gene whole-exome assay, was sequentially performed in a Clinical Laboratory Improvement Amendments-certified clinical laboratory. A decision-support team annotated somatic alterations in clinically actionable genes for function and facilitated therapeutic matching. Survival and the impact of matched therapy use were determined by Kaplan-Meier estimate, log-rank test, and Cox proportional hazards regression.
resultsThe larger NGS panel identified at least one alteration in an actionable gene not previously identified in the smaller sequencing panel in 214 (41%) of 521 of enrolled patients. After the application of decision support, 41% of the alterations in actionable genes were considered to affect the function of the gene and were deemed actionable. Forty patients (40 of 214 [19%]) were subsequently treated with matched therapy. Treatment with matched therapy was associated with significantly improved overall survival compared with treatment with nonmatched therapy (
conclusionCombining decision support with larger NGS panels that incorporate genes beyond those recommended in current treatment guidelines helped to identify patients who were eligible for matched therapy while improving overall treatment selection and survival. This survival benefit was restricted to a small subset of patients.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.