Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32913974›Full record

ArticleJCO precision oncology2017

Window-of-Opportunity Study of Valproic Acid in Breast Cancer Testing a Gene Expression Biomarker.

Adam L Cohen, Leigh Neumayer, Ken Boucher, Rachel E Factor, Gajendra Shrestha, Mark Wade, John G Lamb, Kylee Arbogast, Stephen R Piccolo, Joanna Riegert and 3 more

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JCO precision oncology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 31% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. "Inactive" ingredients in oral medications.Science translational medicine · 2019
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Adam L Cohen, , , , , , , , and , University of Utah; , , , , and , Huntsman Cancer Institute, Salt Lake City; , Brigham Young University, Provo, UT; , University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ; and , Advanced Imaging Research Center, Portland, OR.
Leigh Neumayer, , , , , , , , and , University of Utah; , , , , and , Huntsman Cancer Institute, Salt Lake City; , Brigham Young University, Provo, UT; , University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ; and , Advanced Imaging Research Center, Portland, OR.
Ken Boucher, , , , , , , , and , University of Utah; , , , , and , Huntsman Cancer Institute, Salt Lake City; , Brigham Young University, Provo, UT; , University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ; and , Advanced Imaging Research Center, Portland, OR.
Rachel E Factor, , , , , , , , and , University of Utah; , , , , and , Huntsman Cancer Institute, Salt Lake City; , Brigham Young University, Provo, UT; , University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ; and , Advanced Imaging Research Center, Portland, OR.
Gajendra Shrestha, , , , , , , , and , University of Utah; , , , , and , Huntsman Cancer Institute, Salt Lake City; , Brigham Young University, Provo, UT; , University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ; and , Advanced Imaging Research Center, Portland, OR.
Mark Wade, , , , , , , , and , University of Utah; , , , , and , Huntsman Cancer Institute, Salt Lake City; , Brigham Young University, Provo, UT; , University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ; and , Advanced Imaging Research Center, Portland, OR.
John G Lamb, , , , , , , , and , University of Utah; , , , , and , Huntsman Cancer Institute, Salt Lake City; , Brigham Young University, Provo, UT; , University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ; and , Advanced Imaging Research Center, Portland, OR.
Kylee Arbogast, , , , , , , , and , University of Utah; , , , , and , Huntsman Cancer Institute, Salt Lake City; , Brigham Young University, Provo, UT; , University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ; and , Advanced Imaging Research Center, Portland, OR.
Stephen R Piccolo, , , , , , , , and , University of Utah; , , , , and , Huntsman Cancer Institute, Salt Lake City; , Brigham Young University, Provo, UT; , University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ; and , Advanced Imaging Research Center, Portland, OR.
Joanna Riegert, , , , , , , , and , University of Utah; , , , , and , Huntsman Cancer Institute, Salt Lake City; , Brigham Young University, Provo, UT; , University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ; and , Advanced Imaging Research Center, Portland, OR.
Matthias Schabel, , , , , , , , and , University of Utah; , , , , and , Huntsman Cancer Institute, Salt Lake City; , Brigham Young University, Provo, UT; , University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ; and , Advanced Imaging Research Center, Portland, OR.
Andrea H Bild, , , , , , , , and , University of Utah; , , , , and , Huntsman Cancer Institute, Salt Lake City; , Brigham Young University, Provo, UT; , University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ; and , Advanced Imaging Research Center, Portland, OR.
Theresa L Werner, , , , , , , , and , University of Utah; , , , , and , Huntsman Cancer Institute, Salt Lake City; , Brigham Young University, Provo, UT; , University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ; and , Advanced Imaging Research Center, Portland, OR.
University of Utah · USAdvanced Imaging Research (United States) · USHuntsman Cancer Institute · USUniversity of Arizona · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe anticancer activity of valproic acid (VPA) is attributed to the inhibition of histone deacetylase. We previously published the genomically derived sensitivity signature for VPA (GDSS-VPA), a gene expression biomarker that predicts breast cancer sensitivity to VPA in vitro and in vivo. We conducted a window-of-opportunity study that examined the tolerability of VPA and the ability of the GDSS-VPA to predict biologic changes in breast tumors after treatment with VPA. PATIENTS AND

methodsEligible women had untreated breast cancer with breast tumors larger than 1.5 cm. After a biopsy, women were given VPA for 7 to 12 days, increasing from 30 mg/kg/d orally divided into two doses per day to a maximum of 50 mg/kg/d. After VPA treatment, serum VPA level was measured and then breast surgery or biopsy was performed. Tumor proliferation was assessed by using Ki-67 immunohistochemistry. Histone acetylation of peripheral blood mononuclear cells was assessed by Western blot. Dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging scans were performed before and after VPA treatment.

resultsThirty women were evaluable. The median age was 54 years (range, 31-73 years). Fifty-two percent of women tolerated VPA at 50 mg/kg/d, but 10% missed more than two doses as a result of adverse events. Grade 3 adverse events included vomiting and diarrhea (one patient) and fatigue (one patient). The end serum VPA level correlated with a change in histone acetylation of peripheral blood mononuclear cells (ρ = 0.451;

conclusionVPA was well tolerated and there was a significant correlation between serum VPA levels and histone acetylation. VPA treatment caused a decrease in proliferation of breast tumors. The genomic biomarker correlated with decreased proliferation. Inhibition of histone deacetylase is a valid strategy for drug development in triple-negative breast cancer using gene expression biomarkers.

Identifiers

PMID32913974
PMCPMC7446454
OpenAlexW2611748607

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.