Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32913953›Full record

ArticleEpilepsia open2020

Brivaracetam substituting other antiepileptic treatments: Results of a retrospective study in German epilepsy centers.

Holger Lerche, Susanne Knake, Felix Rosenow, Andreas Schulze-Bonhage, Scarlett Hellot, Iryna Leunikava, Anne-Liv Schulz, Peter Hopp

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Epilepsia open, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Observational
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Holger LercheDepartment of Neurology and Epileptology Hertie Institute for Clinical Brain Research University of Tuebingen Tuebingen Germany.
Susanne KnakeDepartment of Neurology Epilepsy Center Hessen Philipps-University Marburg Marburg Germany.
Felix RosenowEpilepsy Center Frankfurt Rhine-Main Neurocenter University Hospital Frankfurt and Center for Personalized Translational Epilepsy Research (CePTER) Goethe-University Frankfurt am Main Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3989-7471
Andreas Schulze-BonhageEpilepsy Center University Medical Center Freiburg Freiburg Germany.
Scarlett HellotUCB Pharma Monheim am Rhein Germany.
Iryna LeunikavaUCB Pharma Monheim am Rhein Germany.
Anne-Liv SchulzUCB Pharma Monheim am Rhein Germany.
Peter HoppEpilepsy Center Kleinwachau Radeberg Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo evaluate the success of initiation of adjunctive brivaracetam in patients who required a change in antiepileptic drug (AED) regimen and substituted at least one AED with brivaracetam.

methodsIn this retrospective noninterventional study conducted in specialized epilepsy centers across Germany, patients initiated adjunctive brivaracetam between February 15, 2016, and August 31, 2016, as part of an intended change in AED regimen. The primary effectiveness variable was the proportion of patients who continued on brivaracetam after 3 months, and withdrew at least one AED either before or within 6 months after brivaracetam initiation.

resultsFive hundred and six patients had at least one brivaracetam dose and were included in the safety set (SS). Four hundred and seventy patients started to reduce the dose of one AED before/after brivaracetam initiation, had at least one concomitant AED at brivaracetam initiation, and were included in the full analysis set (FAS) for effectiveness analyses. At baseline, patients had a median of seven lifetime AEDs and a median of 3.8 seizures/28 days. In the SS, 85.2% of patients withdrew one AED before/after initiation of brivaracetam, most commonly levetiracetam (49.4%). 46.2% of patients substituted another AED with brivaracetam within 24 hours (fast withdrawal). The proportions of patients (FAS) who continued on brivaracetam after 3 and 6 months and withdrew one AED were 75.5% and 46.6%, respectively. After 6 months, 32.1% of patients were 50% responders; 13.0% were seizure-free. In the SS, 34.6% of patients reported treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs); 21.9% had TEAEs that were assessed by the treating physician as drug-related. Incidences of behavioral AEs before (3-month baseline) and after brivaracetam initiation in patients who withdrew levetiracetam were 19.2% and 8.0%, respectively (5.0% and 7.7% in patients who withdrew other AEDs). SIGNIFICANCE: Brivaracetam was effective and well-tolerated in patients who required a change in AED drug regimen and initiated adjunctive brivaracetam in German clinical practice.

Indexed as

antiseizure; behavioral adverse eventsdrug‐resistant epilepsyfocal seizuresnoninterventional

Identifiers

PMID32913953
PMCPMC7469785

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.