Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32913951›Full record

ArticleEpilepsia open2020

A retrospective review of changes and challenges in the use of antiseizure medicines in Dravet syndrome in Norway.

Katrine Heger, Caroline Lund, Margrete Larsen Burns, Marit Bjørnvold, Erik Sætre, Svein I Johannessen, Cecilie Johannessen Landmark

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Epilepsia open, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Observational
  5. Article
  6. Observational
  7. Article
  8. Dravet Syndrome-The Polish Family's Perspective Study.Journal of clinical medicine · 2021
    Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Katrine HegerProgram for Pharmacy Department of Life Sciences and Health Faculty of Health Sciences Oslo Metropolitan University Oslo Norway.
Caroline LundDepartment of Rare Genetic Syndromes Oslo University Hospital Oslo Norway.
Margrete Larsen BurnsSection for Clinical Pharmacology The National Center for Epilepsy Department of Pharmacology Oslo University Hospital Oslo Norway.
Marit BjørnvoldThe National Center for Epilepsy Oslo University Hospital Oslo Norway.
Erik SætreThe National Center for Epilepsy Oslo University Hospital Oslo Norway.
Svein I JohannessenSection for Clinical Pharmacology The National Center for Epilepsy Department of Pharmacology Oslo University Hospital Oslo Norway.
Cecilie Johannessen LandmarkProgram for Pharmacy Department of Life Sciences and Health Faculty of Health Sciences Oslo Metropolitan University Oslo Norway.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0877-8912
Oslo University Hospital · NOOsloMet – Oslo Metropolitan University · NO

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveDravet syndrome is a developmental and epileptic encephalopathy characterized by severe and drug-resistant seizures in early childhood, followed by developmental delay. The purpose of this study was to investigate aspects of pharmacological treatment of Norwegian patients with Dravet syndrome, focusing on the use of antiseizure medicines (ASMs) and identifying treatment challenges.

methodsPatients were identified through medical registries at the National Center for Epilepsy in Norway and National Center for Rare Epilepsy Related Disorders during 2008-2018. Additional clinical data were obtained from medical records and laboratory request forms.

resultsWe identified 53 patients with Dravet syndrome, 30/23 males/females, aged 2-50 years. The majority of patients with known seizure frequency experienced frequent seizures, 80% (n = 35/44). Only two patients were seizure-free. Valproate (n = 48), clobazam (n = 45), levetiracetam (n = 30), and stiripentol (n = 38) were most commonly used, previous or current use. More than one-third (n = 20) had tried sodium channel blockers (including lamotrigine), but these drugs were used less during the last decade. Polytherapy was common, 81% (n = 43) used two or more ASMs, and eight of these patients used 4-5 drugs (15%). Several challenges were identified: high seizure frequency, comorbidities, treatment changes with a wide range of ASMs, common use of oral gastro-tubes, extensive polypharmacy, and drug interactions. SIGNIFICANCE: The use of ASMs has changed over the last decade, in accordance with updated international recommendations. Various treatment challenges were identified. This vulnerable group of patients needs close follow-up for an optimal treatment outcome.

Indexed as

antiseizure medicinesDravet syndromeepilepsypolypharmacy

Identifiers

PMID32913951
PMCPMC7469772
OpenAlexW3037563333

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.