Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32913949›Full record

ArticleEpilepsia open2020

Improving the effectiveness of ANT DBS therapy for epilepsy with optimal current targeting.

Soila Järvenpää, Kai Lehtimäki, Sirpa Rainesalo, Timo Möttönen, Jukka Peltola

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Epilepsia open, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 41 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. A method for analyzing the ERP associated with high frequency ANT DBS offset.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Emerging Trends in Neuromodulation for Treatment of Drug-Resistant Epilepsy.Frontiers in pain research (Lausanne, Switzerland) · 2022
    Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Soila JärvenpääDepartment of Neurosciences and Rehabilitation Tampere University Hospital Tampere Finland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0484-0560
Kai LehtimäkiDepartment of Neurosciences and Rehabilitation Tampere University Hospital Tampere Finland.
Sirpa RainesaloDepartment of Neurosciences and Rehabilitation Tampere University Hospital Tampere Finland.
Timo MöttönenDepartment of Neurosciences and Rehabilitation Tampere University Hospital Tampere Finland.
Jukka PeltolaDepartment of Neurosciences and Rehabilitation Tampere University Hospital Tampere Finland.
Tampere University Hospital · FITampere University · FI

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveDeep brain stimulation of the ANT is a novel treatment option in refractory epilepsy with an established efficacy at the group level. However, data on the effect of individualized programming are currently lacking. We report the effect of programming changes on outcome in deep brain stimulation of anterior nucleus of thalamus (ANT DBS). Secondly, we investigated whether the effect differs between seizure types. Thirdly, we compared the response status between patients with stimulation contacts verified inside the ANT with patients with contacts located outside of ANT.

methodsThe participants were 27 consecutive patients with ANT DBS implantation with at least two-year follow-up. Seizures were subdivided into focal aware (FAS), focal impaired awareness (FIAS), and focal to bilateral tonic-clonic seizures (FBTCS). The patients' seizure diaries were analyzed retrospectively to assess changes in different seizure types. Active contact locations for each patient were verified from preoperative MRI and postoperative CT fusion images using SureTune III (Medtronic Inc, Minneapolis, MN) software.

resultsA significant reduction in monthly mean seizure frequency occurred in FIAS: 56% at two-year and 65% at five-year follow-up. The effects on FAS and FBTCS were less pronounced. Patients with contacts inside the ANT or on the anterolateral border of ANT experienced a greater reduction in seizure frequency than patients with outside-ANT contacts. Ultimately, seven patients became responders due to changes in DBS programming or repositioning of contacts, increasing our responder rate from 44% to 70% as measured by a seizure reduction of at least 50%. SIGNIFICANCE: ANT DBS appears to be especially effective in reducing FIAS, when the appropriately chosen contacts are activated.

Indexed as

3D modelinganterior nucleus of thalamusdeep brain stimulationoptimizationprogramming

Identifiers

PMID32913949
PMCPMC7469781
OpenAlexW3033551983

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.