ArticleBioactive materials2021
Additive-lathe 3D bioprinting of bilayered nerve conduits incorporated with supportive cells.
Article in Bioactive materials, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
29 citing papers in PubMed, 89 citations in OpenAlex.
- TP53 drives neuronal ferroptosis by promoting KLHL4-mediated SLC7A11 ubiquitination after spinal cord injury.Neural regeneration research · 2026Article
- Engineered nerve guide conduit enhances peripheral nerve regeneration by modulating the microenvironment through macrophage-triggered cascade reactions.Bioactive materials · 2025Article
- Peripheral Nerve Regeneration Reimagined: Cutting-Edge Biomaterials and Biotechnological Innovations.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Review of Gaps in the Clinical Indications and Use of Neural Conduits and Artificial Grafts for Nerve Repair and Reconstruction.Biomacromolecules · 2025Review
- Bioprinting of GelMA/PEGDA Hybrid Bioinks for SH-SY5Y Cell Encapsulation: Role of Molecular Weight and Concentration.Macromolecular bioscience · 2025Article
- Potentially commercializable nerve guidance conduits for peripheral nerve injury: Past, present, and future.Materials today. Bio · 2025Review
- Perspectives on Schwann-like cells derived from bone marrow-mesenchymal stem cells: Advancing peripheral nerve injury therapies.World journal of stem cells · 2025Article
- Three-Dimensional Printing/Bioprinting and Cellular Therapies for Regenerative Medicine: Current Advances.Journal of functional biomaterials · 2025Review
- Advances in 3D printing combined with tissue engineering for nerve regeneration and repair.Journal of nanobiotechnology · 2025Review
- The Application of Stem Cells and Exosomes in Promoting Nerve Conduits for Peripheral Nerve Repair.Biomaterials research · 2025Review
- Recent research progresses of bioengineered biliary stents.Materials today. Bio · 2024Review
- Review
- Synthesis, Properties, and Biocompatibility of 4-Carboxyphenyboronic Acid-Modified Gelatin-Methacryloyl: A Hydrogel for Retinal Surgeries.ACS omega · 2024Article
- The cutting-edge progress in bioprinting for biomedicine: principles, applications, and future perspectives.MedComm · 2024Review
- Scaffold design considerations for peripheral nerve regeneration.Journal of neural engineering · 2024Review
- Highly oriented hydrogels for tissue regeneration: design strategies, cellular mechanisms, and biomedical applications.Theranostics · 2024Review
- Advantages of photo-curable collagen-based cell-laden bioinks compared to methacrylated gelatin (GelMA) in digital light processing (DLP) and extrusion bioprinting.Materials today. Bio · 2023Article
- Photo-crosslinked bioactive BG/BMSCs@GelMA hydrogels for bone-defect repairs.Materials today. Bio · 2023Article
- The Porous Structure of Peripheral Nerve Guidance Conduits: Features, Fabrication, and Implications for Peripheral Nerve Regeneration.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023Review
- Prospects of Using Chitosan-Based Biopolymers in the Treatment of Peripheral Nerve Injuries.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Nerve conduits have been identified as one of the most promising treatments for peripheral nerve injuries, yet it remains unsolved how to develop ideal nerve conduits with both appropriate biological and mechanical properties. Existing nerve conduits must make trade-offs between mechanical strength and biocompatibility. Here, we propose a multi-nozzle additive-lathe 3D bioprinting technology to fabricate a bilayered nerve conduit. The materials for printing consisted of gelatin methacrylate (GelMA)-based inner layer, which was cellularized with bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells (BMSCs) and GelMA/poly(ethylene glycol) diacrylate (PEGDA)-based outer layer. The high viability and extensive morphological spreading of BMSCs encapsulated in the inner layer was achieved by adjusting the degree of methacryloyl substitution and the concentration of GelMA. Strong mechanical performance of the outer layer was obtained by the addition of PEGDA. The performance of the bilayered nerve conduits was assessed using
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.