Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32913902›Full record

ArticleSynthetic and systems biotechnology2020

Expanding application of CRISPR-Cas9 system in microorganisms.

Jing Zhao, Huan Fang, Dawei Zhang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Synthetic and systems biotechnology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. CRISPR/Cas9 systems: Delivery technologies and biomedical applications.Asian journal of pharmaceutical sciences · 2023
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. A Special Phenotype of AconidialJournal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Jing ZhaoTianjin Institute of Industrial Biotechnology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Tianjin, 300308, People's Republic of China.
Huan FangTianjin Institute of Industrial Biotechnology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Tianjin, 300308, People's Republic of China.
Dawei ZhangTianjin Institute of Industrial Biotechnology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Tianjin, 300308, People's Republic of China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The development of CRISPR-Cas9 based genetic manipulation tools represents a huge breakthrough in life sciences and has been stimulating research on metabolic engineering, synthetic biology, and systems biology. The CRISPR-Cas9 and its derivative tools are one of the best choices for precise genome editing, multiplexed genome editing, and reversible gene expression control in microorganisms. However, challenges remain for applying CRISPR-Cas9 in novel microorganisms, especially those industrial microorganism hosts that are intractable using traditional genetic manipulation tools. How to further extend CRISPR-Cas9 to these microorganisms is being an urgent matter. In this review, we first introduce the mechanism and application of CRISPR-Cas9, then discuss how to optimize CRISPR-Cas9 as genome editing tools, including but not limited to how to reduce off-target effects and Cas9 related toxicity, and how to increase on-target efficiency by optimizing crRNA and sgRNA design.

Indexed as

Cas9 toxicityCRISPR-Cas9 systemMicroorganismsOff-targetsgRNA

Identifiers

PMID32913902
PMCPMC7451738

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.