ArticlePeerJ2020
Why people select the outpatient clinic of medical centers: a nationwide analysis in Taiwan.
Article in PeerJ, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
- Validation of Diagnostic Codes to Identify Glaucoma in Taiwan's Claims Data: A Multi-Institutional Study.Clinical epidemiology · 2024Article
- The impact of COVID-19 epidemic on emergency department visits of older patients in Taiwan.BMC geriatrics · 2023Article
- Effects of intravascular photobiomodulation on cognitive impairment and crossed cerebellar diaschisis in patients with traumatic brain injury: a longitudinal study.Lasers in medical science · 2023Article
- Trichomonas infection in pregnant women: a nationwide cohort study.Parasitology research · 2022Article
- Varied impacts on outpatient services among departments and divisions in the early phase of the COVID-19 pandemic: Implications for personnel mobilization and preparatory training.Journal of the Chinese Medical Association : JCMA · 2021Article
- Overview of Facebook Use by Hospitals in Italy: A Nationwide Survey during the COVID-19 Emergency.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionIn contrast to other countries, Taiwan's National Health Insurance (NHI) program allows patients to freely select the specialists and tiers of medical care facility without a referral. Some medical centers in Taiwan receive over 10,000 outpatients per day. In the NHI program, the co-payment was increased for high-tier facilities for outpatient visits in 2002, 2005, and 2017. However, the policies only mildly reduced the use of high-tier medical care facilities. The main purpose of this study was to evaluate the factors contributing to the patients' selection of the outpatient clinic of medical centers without a referral.
methodsAn online anonymous survey was conducted by using the Google Forms platform utilizing a self-constructed questionnaire from September to October 2018. A nationwide sample in Taiwan was recruited using convenience sampling through social media. Based on a literature review and a focus group, 20 factors that may affect the choice of the outpatient institution were constructed. The associations between items that affect the patients selection of outpatient clinics were assessed using exploratory factor analysis. Principal axis factoring was performed to identify the major factors affecting the decision. Multiple logistic regression was performed to determine which factors satisfactorily explained "visiting the outpatient clinic of the medical center for an illness without a referral."
resultsDuring the survey period, 5,060 people browsed the online survey, and 1,003 responded and completed the online questionnaire. Therefore, the response rate was 19.8%. A total of 987 valid responses was collected. Exploratory factor analysis revealed that three main factors, namely the "physician factor", "image and reputation factor", and "facility and medication factor", affected the selection of outpatient clinics. A series of logistic regressions indicated that patients who reported that hospital facilities, high-quality drugs, and diverse specialties were very important were more likely to select the outpatient clinic of a medical center (OR = 2.218, 95% CI [1.514-3.249]). Patients who reported that physician factors were very important were less likely to select a medical center (OR = 0.717, 95% CI [0.523-0.984]). Patients who were previously satisfied with their experience of the primary clinics or had a regular family doctor were less likely to choose a medical center (OR = 0.509, 95% CI -0.435-0.595] and OR = 0.676, 95% CI [0.471-0.969]).
conclusionIn Taiwan, patients with good primary medical experience and regular family physicians had significantly lower rates by selecting the outpatient clinic of a medical center. The results of this study support that the key to establishing graded medical care is to prioritize the strengthening of the primary medical system.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.