Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32913678›Full record

ArticlePeerJ2020

Plastid transit peptides-where do they come from and where do they all belong? Multi-genome and pan-genomic assessment of chloroplast transit peptide evolution.

Ryan W Christian, Seanna L Hewitt, Grant Nelson, Eric H Roalson, Amit Dhingra

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PeerJ, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 27% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Biosynthesis of irregular monoterpene lavandulol inSynthetic and systems biotechnology · 2025
    Article
  6. Photosynthetic demands on translational machinery drive retention of redundant tRNA metabolism in plant organelles.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024
    Article
  7. Regulation of chloroplast biogenesis, development, and signaling by endogenous and exogenous cues.Physiology and molecular biology of plants : an international journal of functional plant biology · 2024
    Review
  8. Evolution ofFrontiers in plant science · 2024
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Ryan W ChristianMolecular Plant Sciences, Washington State University, Pullman, WA, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-6773-3992
Seanna L HewittMolecular Plant Sciences, Washington State University, Pullman, WA, USA.
Grant NelsonMolecular Plant Sciences, Washington State University, Pullman, WA, USA.
Eric H RoalsonMolecular Plant Sciences, Washington State University, Pullman, WA, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-1655-3681
Amit DhingraMolecular Plant Sciences, Washington State University, Pullman, WA, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-4464-2502
Washington State University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Subcellular relocalization of proteins determines an organism's metabolic repertoire and thereby its survival in unique evolutionary niches. In plants, the plastid and its various morphotypes import a large and varied number of nuclear-encoded proteins to orchestrate vital biochemical reactions in a spatiotemporal context. Recent comparative genomics analysis and high-throughput shotgun proteomics data indicate that there are a large number of plastid-targeted proteins that are either semi-conserved or non-conserved across different lineages. This implies that homologs are differentially targeted across different species, which is feasible only if proteins have gained or lost plastid targeting peptides during evolution. In this study, a broad, multi-genome analysis of 15 phylogenetically diverse genera and in-depth analyses of pangenomes from Arabidopsis and Brachypodium were performed to address the question of how proteins acquire or lose plastid targeting peptides. The analysis revealed that random insertions or deletions were the dominant mechanism by which novel transit peptides are gained by proteins. While gene duplication was not a strict requirement for the acquisition of novel subcellular targeting, 40% of novel plastid-targeted genes were found to be most closely related to a sequence within the same genome, and of these, 30.5% resulted from alternative transcription or translation initiation sites. Interestingly, analysis of the distribution of amino acids in the transit peptides of known and predicted chloroplast-targeted proteins revealed monocot and eudicot-specific preferences in residue distribution.

Indexed as

ChloroplastMulti-genomePangenomePlastidProtein targetingSignal peptideTransit peptide

Identifiers

PMID32913678
PMCPMC7456531
OpenAlexW3081870720

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.