ArticleActa radiologica open2020
Multimodal neuroimaging of gliomatosis cerebri: a case series of four patients.
Article in Acta radiologica open, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
- Surgical treatment of diffuse and multi-lobes involved glioma with the assistance of a multimodal technique.Scientific reports · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In the latest World Health Organization classification of brain tumors, gliomatosis cerebri has been redefined to varying subsets of diffuse gliomas; however, the term is still used to describe gliomas with infiltrative growth into three or more cerebral lobes. These tumors are frequently misdiagnosed and difficult to treat due to their atypical presentation using structural imaging modalities including computed tomography and T1/T2-weighted magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). In this retrospective case series, we compared clinical MRI to amino acid positron emission tomography (PET) to assess the potential value of PET in the assessment of the extent of tumor involvement and in monitoring disease progression. We report the clinical course and serial multimodal imaging findings of four patients. Each patient presented at varying points in disease progression with widespread glioma brain involvement and was evaluated at least once by amino acid PET using alpha-[
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.