Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32913609›Full record

ArticleOrthopedic reviews2020

3D printing in shoulder surgery.

Vincenzo Campana, Valentina Cardona, Valeria Vismara, Andrea Stefano Monteleone, Piero Piazza, Piermarco Messinese, Fabrizio Mocini, Giuseppe Sircana, Giulio Maccauro, Maristella Francesca Saccomanno

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Orthopedic reviews, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Vincenzo CampanaOrthopedic Institute, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli, IRCSS, Rome, Italy.
Valentina CardonaOrthopedic Institute, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli, IRCSS, Rome, Italy.
Valeria VismaraOrthopedic Institute, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli, IRCSS, Rome, Italy.
Andrea Stefano MonteleoneOrthopedic Institute, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli, IRCSS, Rome, Italy.
Piero PiazzaOrthopedic Institute, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli, IRCSS, Rome, Italy.
Piermarco MessineseOrthopedic Institute, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli, IRCSS, Rome, Italy.
Fabrizio MociniOrthopedic Institute, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli, IRCSS, Rome, Italy.
Giuseppe SircanaOrthopedic Institute, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli, IRCSS, Rome, Italy.
Giulio MaccauroOrthopedic Institute, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli, IRCSS, Rome, Italy.
Maristella Francesca SaccomannoOrthopedic Institute, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli, IRCSS, Rome, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Three-dimensional (3D) printing is a novel modality with the potential to make a huge impact in the surgical field. The aim of this paper is to provide an overview on the current use of 3D printing in shoulder surgery. We have reviewed the use of this new method in 3 fields of shoulder surgery: shoulder arthroplasty, recurrent shoulder instability and orthopedic shoulder traumatology. In shoulder arthroplasty, several authors have shown that the use of the 3D printer improves the positioning of the glenoid component, even if longer clinical follow-up is needed to determine whether the cost of this system rationalizes the potential improved functional outcomes and decreases glenoid revision rates. In the treatment of anterior shoulder instability, the literature agrees on the fact that the use of the 3D printing can: enhance the dept and size of bony lesions, allowing a patient tailored surgical planning and potentially reducing operative times; allow the production of personalized implants to restore substantial bone loss; restore glenohumeral morphology and instability. In orthopedic trauma, the use of 3D printing can be helpful to increase the understanding of fracture patterns, facilitating a more personalized planning, and can be used for resident training and education. We can conclude the current literature regarding the use of 3D printed models in orthopedic surgery agrees finding objective improvements to preoperative planning and to the surgical procedure itself, by shortening the intraoperative time and by the possibility to develop custom-made, patient-specific surgical instruments, and it suggests that there are tangible benefits for its implementation.

Indexed as

3D PrintingArthroplastyPatientspecific instrumentationShoulder InstabilityTrauma surgery

Identifiers

PMID32913609
PMCPMC7459384

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.