Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32913603›Full record

ArticleOrthopedic reviews2020

Foot metastasis: Current knowledge.

Tommaso Greco, Luigi Cianni, Domenico De Mauro, Giacomo Dughiero, Maria Beatrice Bocchi, Gianpiero Cazzato, Giulia Ragonesi, Francesco Liuzza, Giulio Maccauro, Carlo Perisano

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Orthopedic reviews, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Surgical management of tibial metastases: a systematic review.Acta bio-medica : Atenei Parmensis · 2022
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Overview of Ankle Arthropathy in Hereditary Hemochromatosis.Medical sciences (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Lisfranc complex injuries management and treatment: current knowledge.International journal of physiology, pathophysiology and pharmacology · 2022
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Ankle hemophilic arthropathy: literature review.American journal of blood research · 2021
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Tommaso GrecoFondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCSS, Rome.
Luigi CianniFondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCSS, Rome.
Domenico De MauroFondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCSS, Rome.
Giacomo DughieroUniversità Cattolica Del Sacro Cuore, Rome.
Maria Beatrice BocchiFondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCSS, Rome.
Gianpiero CazzatoFondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCSS, Rome.
Giulia RagonesiUniversità Cattolica Del Sacro Cuore, Rome.
Francesco LiuzzaFondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCSS, Rome.
Giulio MaccauroFondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCSS, Rome.
Carlo PerisanoFondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCSS, Rome.
Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore · ITAgostino Gemelli University Polyclinic · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Foot metastasis are rare and often overlooked due to non-specifical symptoms. This often leads to misdiagnosis delaying the right diagnosis. Metastatic disease of the foot is rare. Foot pain and swelling may be the presenting symptom of an occult malignancy. If metastatic disease is not kept in the differential diagnosis of foot pain, diagnosis and treatment will be delayed. The purpose of this study was to analyze articles presenting cases of foot metastasis to provide a more accurate incidence of symptomatic foot acrometastasis as well as to review the clinical course and outcomes. Studies were searched on PubMed/Medline from the inception to February 2020. All studies included in the review presented foot metastasis either with or without a known primary tumor. Most of the articles were case reports, to which we added two case reports of foot acrometastasis produced by our Institute. Forty-three studies with a total of 45 patients were included in this review. The literature published mostly concerning case reports about old patients (average age: 63,2), in a late phase of their disease. Lung cancer appeared to be the most common primary tumor, followed by endometrial and breast cancer. In the 36% of the cases foot metastasis were found when the primary site was still unknown. Calcaneus and metatarsal bones were the most common bones involved. Surgical solution is rare, the chosen treatments are often of palliative care. Prognosis was often poor, death occurred within 2 years since the discovery of foot metastasis in about 50% of cases.

Indexed as

acrometastasisboneextremitiesfootmetastasis

Identifiers

PMID32913603
PMCPMC7459381
OpenAlexW3040626599

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.