ArticleAnnals of burns and fire disasters2020
The outcome of fungal infections in a burn intensive care unit: a study of 172 patients.
Article in Annals of burns and fire disasters, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.
- [Bacteraemias due to Enterococci in Burns: Incidence and Factors Associated to Mortality].Annals of burns and fire disasters · 2026Article
- Azole Resistance in Candida parapsilosis From Patients With Burns in Mexico: A Genomic and Phylogenetic Analysis.Mycoses · 2026Article
- Identification of fungal agents isolated from burn lesions using mycological and molecular methods in patients admitted to Velayat burn hospital in Rasht city during 2022-2023.Iranian journal of microbiology · 2024Article
- Clinical impact of fungal colonization of burn wounds in patients hospitalized in the intensive care unit: a retrospective cohort study.Trauma surgery & acute care open · 2024Article
- [Research advances on invasive fungal infections after burns].Zhonghua shao shang yu chuang mian xiu fu za zhi · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Burned patients are an especially fragile population in which infections are a leading cause of death and morbidity. Fungal infections have become increasingly prevalent in Intensive Care Units (ICUs) and burn ICUs. Management of fungal colonization and infection still constitutes a challenge for clinicians. The aim of this retrospective cross-sectional study was to characterize the population of burn patients with fungal infections admitted to our Burn ICU between January 2013 and December 2015. Patients were characterized according to age, gender, date of admission and exit, type of burn, type of exit, total body surface area (TBSA) and presence of inhalation injury. Positive fungal cultures, causative pathogen and site of sampling were also registered. Statistical analysis centred around the presence of fungal infection/colonization was performed using IBM SPSS Statistics. A total of 172 patients were included, 38 (22.1%) had a positive fungal culture and of these 8 (21.1%) died. Patients with fungal infection/colonization stayed more days than those without infection. However, this tendency did not reach statistical significance when patients that died in the ICU were excluded. No relationships were found when comparing positive fungal cultures with TBSA, burn aetiology, inhalation injury or mortality. Fungal infections are a major cause of morbidity and mortality despite TBSA, burn type or presence of inhalation injury. Efforts should be made to improve management of fungal infections, especially in burn patients and other critically ill groups.
Indexed as
Identifiers
32913429PMC7452606W2954057707What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.