ArticleAnnals of burns and fire disasters2020
Comprehensive perception of burn conversion: a literature review.
Article in Annals of burns and fire disasters, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Burn conversion is the conversion of stasis zone into both greater burn area and burn depth. It may hamper the patient's condition since morbidity and mortality are expected to be higher with the increase of burn size. To gain a comprehensive perception of burn conversion, this study aims to collect the latest updates regarding therapy, diagnosis, etiology and prognosis. A literature search was carried out on online databases, namely PubMed, SCOPUS and PROQUEST. The keywords "Burns AND (Conversion OR Progression OR Expansion)" were formulated. The inclusion and exclusion criteria were applied. Twenty-six articles were found, which were divided into diagnosis of burn conversion (11%), etiology of burn conversion (8%), prognosis of burn conversion (0%), and therapy of burn conversion (81%). All of the research was performed on animals. One of the best tools to diagnose burn conversion was the forwardlooking infrared (FLIR) imaging, having sensitivity up to 96% and specificity up to 100% to predict scar depth ≥3 mm. The main etiology was ischemia, reactive oxygen species and inflammation. Most of the research regarding therapy showed benefit in preventing burn conversion. However, no side effects were investigated and not all of the research was statistically significant. More research on burn conversion prognosis and treatment side effects should be performed. Further research involving trials in humans should be conducted, since animal and human trials may differ.
Indexed as
Identifiers
32913427PMC7452607What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.