ArticleScientific reports2020
A biocomposite-based rapid sampling assay for circulating cell-free DNA in liquid biopsy samples from human cancers.
Article in Scientific reports, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.
- Diagnostic methods for pancreatic cancer and their clinical applications (Review).Oncology letters · 2025Review
- The Cyclobutanocucurbit[5-8]uril Family: Electronegative Cavities in Contrast to Classical Cucurbituril while the Electropositive Outer Surface Acts as a Crystal Packing Driver.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Cell-free nucleic acids (cfNAs) in liquid biopsy samples are emerging as important biomarkers for cancer diagnosis and monitoring, and for predicting treatment outcomes. Many cfNA isolation methods have been developed recently. However, most of these techniques are time-consuming, complex, require large equipment, and yield low-purity cfNAs because the genetic background of normal cells is amplified during cell lysis, which limits their clinical application. Here, we report a rapid and simple cfNA sampling platform that can overcome the limitations of conventional methods. We synthesised a biocomposite by combining amine-modified diatomaceous earth (DE) and cucurbituril (CB). The biocomposite platform showed high capture efficiency (86.78-90.26%) with genomic DNA and amplified DNA products (777, 525 and 150 bp). The biocomposite platform allowed the isolation of high purity and quantity cfDNAs from the plasma of 13 cancer patients (three colorectal cancer and ten pancreatic cancer samples) without requiring a lysis step or special equipment. The biocomposite platform may be useful to isolate cfNAs for the diagnosis and treatment of cancers in clinical applications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.