Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32913057›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2020

Spatial heterogeneity can lead to substantial local variations in COVID-19 timing and severity.

Loring J Thomas, Peng Huang, Fan Yin, Xiaoshuang Iris Luo, Zack W Almquist, John R Hipp, Carter T Butts

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 62 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
62citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

62 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Hospital Capacity Pooling in Pandemics: Simulation-Based Mortality Impacts and Diversification Mechanisms.Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Partisan differences in health behaviors can impact respiratory disease dynamics.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Endogenous competition and the underrealized reproduction of infectious diseases.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Observational
  13. Article
  14. On the friendship paradox and inversity: A network property with applications to privacy-sensitive network interventions.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

2 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Loring J ThomasDepartment of Sociology, University of California, Irvine, CA, 92697.
Peng HuangDepartment of Sociology, University of California, Irvine, CA, 92697.ORCID 0000-0001-5614-786X
Fan YinDepartment of Statistics, University of California, Irvine, CA, 92697.ORCID 0000-0002-8028-2217
Xiaoshuang Iris LuoDepartment of Criminology, Law, and Society, University of California, Irvine, CA, 92697.ORCID 0000-0001-8874-1599
Zack W AlmquistDepartment of Sociology, Center for Studies in Demography and Ecology, Center for Statistics and Social Sciences, eScience, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, 98195.ORCID 0000-0002-1967-123X
John R HippDepartment of Criminology, Law, and Society, University of California, Irvine, CA, 92697.ORCID 0000-0001-9006-2587
Carter T ButtsDepartment of Sociology, University of California, Irvine, CA, 92697; buttsc@uci.edu.ORCID 0000-0002-7911-9834

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Standard epidemiological models for COVID-19 employ variants of compartment (SIR or susceptible-infectious-recovered) models at local scales, implicitly assuming spatially uniform local mixing. Here, we examine the effect of employing more geographically detailed diffusion models based on known spatial features of interpersonal networks, most particularly the presence of a long-tailed but monotone decline in the probability of interaction with distance, on disease diffusion. Based on simulations of unrestricted COVID-19 diffusion in 19 US cities, we conclude that heterogeneity in population distribution can have large impacts on local pandemic timing and severity, even when aggregate behavior at larger scales mirrors a classic SIR-like pattern. Impacts observed include severe local outbreaks with long lag time relative to the aggregate infection curve, and the presence of numerous areas whose disease trajectories correlate poorly with those of neighboring areas. A simple catchment model for hospital demand illustrates potential implications for health care utilization, with substantial disparities in the timing and extremity of impacts even without distancing interventions. Likewise, analysis of social exposure to others who are morbid or deceased shows considerable variation in how the epidemic can appear to individuals on the ground, potentially affecting risk assessment and compliance with mitigation measures. These results demonstrate the potential for spatial network structure to generate highly nonuniform diffusion behavior even at the scale of cities, and suggest the importance of incorporating such structure when designing models to inform health care planning, predict community outcomes, or identify potential disparities.

Indexed as

BetacoronavirusCitiesCoronavirus InfectionsCOVID-19Delivery of Health CareDemographyHealth Status DisparitiesHumansModels, StatisticalPandemicsPneumonia, ViralSARS-CoV-2Social NetworkingUnited StatesCOVID-19diffusionhealth disparitiessocial networksspatial heterogeneity

Identifiers

PMID32913057
PMCPMC7533653

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.