Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32912983›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2020

Comparison of the CHU-9D and the EQ-5D-Y instruments in children and young people with cerebral palsy: a cross-sectional study.

Jennifer M Ryan, Ellen McKay, Nana Anokye, Marika Noorkoiv, Nicola Theis, Grace Lavelle

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Comparing the measurement properties of the EQ-5D-Y-3L, EQ-5D-Y-5L and CHU9D in children and adolescents: a measurement property study.The European journal of health economics : HEPAC : health economics in prevention and care · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Development of algorithms for estimating the Child Health Utility 9D from Caregiver Priorities and Child Health Index of Life with Disability.Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation · 2024
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Jennifer M RyanCollege of Health, Medicine and Life Sciences, Brunel University London, Uxbridge, Middlesex, UK jennifer.ryan@brunel.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0003-3768-2132
Ellen McKayDepartment of Public Health and Epidemiology, Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland, Dublin, Ireland.
Nana AnokyeHealth Economics Research Group, Brunel University London, London, Middlesex, UK.
Marika NoorkoivCollege of Health, Medicine and Life Sciences, Brunel University London, Uxbridge, Middlesex, UK.
Nicola TheisSchool of Sport and Exercise, University of Gloucestershire, Cheltenham, Gloucestershire, UK.
Grace LavelleInstitute of Psychiatry, King's College London, London, UK.
Brunel University of London · GBRoyal College of Surgeons in Ireland · IEKing's College London · GBUniversity of Gloucestershire · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo compare the performance of the EuroQol 5D youth (EQ-5D-Y) and child health utility 9D (CHU-9D) for assessing health-related quality of life (HRQoL) in children and young people (CYP) with cerebral palsy (CP).

designCross-sectional study.

settingEngland.

participantsSixty-four CYP with CP aged 10-19 years in Gross Motor Function Classification System (GMFCS) levels I-III.

main outcome measuresMissing data were examined to assess feasibility. Associations between utility values and individual dimensions on each instrument were examined to assess convergent validity. Associations between utility values and GMFCS level were examined to assess known-group differences.

resultsMissing data were <5% for both instruments. Twenty participants (32.3%) and 11 participants (18.0%) reported full health for the EQ-5D-Y and CHU-9D, respectively. There was poor agreement between utilities from the two instruments (intraclass correlation coefficient=0.62; 95% limits of agreement -0.58 to 0.29). Correlations between EQ-5D-Y and CHU-9D dimensions were weak to moderate (r=0.25 to 0.59). GMFCS level was associated with EQ-5D-Y utility values but not CHU-9D utility values.

conclusionThe EQ-5D-Y and CHU-9D are feasible measures of HRQoL in CYP with CP. However, the two instruments demonstrate poor agreement and should not be used to measure and value HRQoL in CYP with CP interchangeably. We propose that the CHU-9D may be preferable to use in this population as it assesses concepts that influence HRQoL among CYP with CP and provides less extreme utility values than the EQ-5D-Y.

Indexed as

Cerebral PalsyQuality of LifeAdolescentAdultChildChild HealthCross-Sectional StudiesEnglandHumansReproducibility of ResultsSurveys and QuestionnairesYoung Adultdevelopmental neurology & neurodisabilityhealth economicspaediatrics

Identifiers

PMID32912983
PMCPMC7485239
OpenAlexW3084774593

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.