Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32912942›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2020

Study protocol of a multicentre, randomised, controlled trial evaluating the effectiveness of probiotic and peanut oral immunotherapy (PPOIT) in inducing desensitisation or tolerance in children with peanut allergy compared with oral immunotherapy (OIT) alone and with placebo (the PPOIT-003 study).

Adriana Chebar Lozinsky, Paxton Loke, Francesca Orsini, Michael O'Sullivan, Susan L Prescott, Michael S Gold, Patrick Quinn, Audrey DunnGalvin, Mimi Lk Tang, PPOIT study team

Open access · goldAbstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 31% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 5 institutions in 3 countries.

Adriana Chebar LozinskyAllergy Immunology, Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Parkville, Victoria, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-6765-2762
Paxton LokeAllergy Immunology, Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Parkville, Victoria, Australia.
Francesca OrsiniClinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics Unit, Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Parkville, Victoria, Australia.
Michael O'SullivanORIGINS Project, Telethon Kids Institute, Nedlands, Western Australia, Australia.
Susan L PrescottORIGINS Project, Telethon Kids Institute, Nedlands, Western Australia, Australia.
Michael S GoldPaediatrics, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.
Patrick QuinnPaediatrics, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.
Audrey DunnGalvinSchool of Applied Psychology, University College Cork, Cork, Ireland.
Mimi Lk TangAllergy Immunology, Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Parkville, Victoria, Australia mimi.tang@rch.org.au.
PPOIT study team
Murdoch Children's Research Institute · AURoyal Children's Hospital · AUThe Kids Research Institute Australia · AUWomen's and Children's Hospital · AUSechenov University · RU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionPeanut allergy is the the most common cause of life-threatening food-induced anaphylaxis. There is currently no effective long-term treatment. There is a pressing need for definitive treatments that improve the quality of life and prevent fatalities. Allergen oral immunotherapy (OIT) is a promising approach, which is effective at inducing desensitisation; however, OIT has a limited ability to induce sustained unresponsiveness (SU). We have previously shown that a novel treatment comprising a combination of the probiotic METHODS AND ANALYSIS: 200 children 1 to 10 years of age with current peanut allergy confirmed by failed double-blind placebo-controlled food challenge (DBPCFC) at study screening will be recruited from three tertiary paediatric hospitals in Australia. There are three intervention arms-PPOIT, peanut OIT alone or placebo. Interventions are administered once daily for 18 months. The dual primary outcomes are: (1) the proportion of children who attain 8-week SU in the PPOIT group versus placebo group and (2) the proportion of children who attain 8-week SU in the PPOIT group versus OIT group. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: This study has been approved by the Human Research Ethics Committees at the Royal Children's Hospital (HREC 35246) and the Child and Adolescent Health Service (RGS 2543). Results will be published in peer-reviewed journals and disseminated via presentations at international conferences. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ACTRN12616000322437.

Indexed as

Peanut HypersensitivityProbioticsAdministration, OralAdolescentAllergensArachisAustraliaChildDesensitization, ImmunologicHumansMulticenter Studies as TopicQuality of LifeRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicAllergensallergyclinical trialspaediatrics

Identifiers

PMID32912942
PMCPMC7482477
OpenAlexW3084115564

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.