Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32912809›Full record

SynthesisPatient education and counseling2021

Can self-management programmes change healthcare utilisation in COPD?: A systematic review and framework analysis.

Katelyn R Smalley, Lisa Aufegger, Kelsey Flott, Erik K Mayer, Ara Darzi

Open access · hybridAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Patient education and counseling, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Katelyn R SmalleyNIHR Imperial Patient Safety Translational Research Centre (PSTRC), Institute of Global Health Innovation, Department of Surgery & Cancer, Imperial College London, London, UK. Electronic address: k.smalley17@imperial.ac.uk.
Lisa AufeggerNIHR Imperial Patient Safety Translational Research Centre (PSTRC), Institute of Global Health Innovation, Department of Surgery & Cancer, Imperial College London, London, UK. Electronic address: l.aufegger@imperial.ac.uk.
Kelsey FlottNIHR Imperial Patient Safety Translational Research Centre (PSTRC), Institute of Global Health Innovation, Department of Surgery & Cancer, Imperial College London, London, UK. Electronic address: k.flott14@imperial.ac.uk.
Erik K MayerNIHR Imperial Patient Safety Translational Research Centre (PSTRC), Institute of Global Health Innovation, Department of Surgery & Cancer, Imperial College London, London, UK. Electronic address: e.mayer@imperial.ac.uk.
Ara DarziNIHR Imperial Patient Safety Translational Research Centre (PSTRC), Institute of Global Health Innovation, Department of Surgery & Cancer, Imperial College London, London, UK. Electronic address: a.darzi@imperial.ac.uk.
NIHR Imperial Biomedical Research Centre · GBImperial College London · GB

Funding

Department of Health PSTRC-2016-004
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThe study aims to evaluate the ability of self-management programmes to change the healthcare-seeking behaviours of people with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD), and any associations between programme design and outcomes.

methodsA systematic search of the literature returned randomised controlled trials of SMPs for COPD. Change in healthcare utilisation was the primary outcome measure. Programme design was analysed using the Theoretical Domains Framework (TDF).

resultsA total of 26 papers described 19 SMPs. The most common utilisation outcome was hospitalisation (n = 22). Of these, 5 showed a significant decrease. Two theoretical domains were evidenced in all programmes: skills and behavioural regulation. All programmes evidenced at least 5 domains. However, there was no clear association between TDF domains and utilisation. Overall, study quality was moderate to poor.

conclusionThis review highlights the need for more alignment in the goals, design, and evaluation of SMPs. Specifically, the TDF could be used to guide programme design and evaluation in future. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS: Practices have a reasonable expectation that interventions they adopt will provide patient benefit and value for money. Better design and reporting of SMP trials would address their ability to do so.

Indexed as

Pulmonary Disease, Chronic ObstructiveSelf-ManagementHumansPatient Acceptance of Health CareQuality of LifeSelf CareAttitudesBehaviour changeChronic diseaseComplex interventionsCOPDDisease managementEffectivenessHealth behaviourHealth knowledgeHealth literacyHealth promotionPatient educationPatient participationPracticeRisk reduction behaviourSelf-management

Identifiers

PMID32912809
PMCPMC7762718
OpenAlexW3081931937

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.