Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32912643›Full record

ArticleVaccine2020

Caregiver and service provider vaccine confidence following the Changchun Changsheng vaccine incident in China: A cross-sectional mixed methods study.

Shiyi Tu, Fiona Yueqian Sun, Tracey Chantler, Xuan Zhang, Mark Jit, Kaiyi Han, Lance Rodewald, Fanxing Du, Hongjie Yu, Zhiyuan Hou and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Vaccine, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Shiyi TuSchool of Public Health, NHC Key Laboratory of Health Technology Assessment, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
Fiona Yueqian SunDepartment of Infectious Disease Epidemiology, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, United Kingdom.
Tracey ChantlerDepartment of Global Health and Development, Faculty of Public Health and Policy, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, United Kingdom.
Xuan ZhangChinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Beijing, China.
Mark JitDepartment of Infectious Disease Epidemiology, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, United Kingdom.
Kaiyi HanSchool of Public Health, NHC Key Laboratory of Health Technology Assessment, Fudan University, Shanghai, China; Department of Infectious Disease Epidemiology, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, United Kingdom.
Lance RodewaldChinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Beijing, China.
Fanxing DuSchool of Public Health, NHC Key Laboratory of Health Technology Assessment, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
Hongjie YuSchool of Public Health, NHC Key Laboratory of Health Technology Assessment, Fudan University, Shanghai, China; Key Laboratory of Public Health Safety (Ministry of Education), Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
Zhiyuan HouSchool of Public Health, NHC Key Laboratory of Health Technology Assessment, Fudan University, Shanghai, China. Electronic address: zyhou@fudan.edu.cn.
Heidi LarsonDepartment of Infectious Disease Epidemiology, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, United Kingdom.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionThe Changchun Changsheng Vaccine Incident (CCVI) occurred mid-2018 and involved irregularities in the manufacture and quality control of diphtheria-tetanus-acellular-pertussis and rabies vaccines. This study investigates vaccine confidence amongst Chinese caregivers and vaccination-service providers (VSPs) six months after the CCVI.

methodsQuantitative surveys were conducted in January 2019 with 2124 caregivers of children and 555 VSPs in three areas in China. The proportions of respondents who agreed to the four statements from the Vaccine Confidence Index™ were used to measure vaccine confidence. Descriptive and univariate analyses were performed to study the level of vaccine confidence. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 48 caregivers, 43 VSPs and 9 immunization program managers. Interviews were analyzed thematically using a combination of deductive and inductive coding. Media surveillance was conducted to monitor public responses to the CCVI.

resultsMedia surveillance indicated that public attention to vaccine-related issues increased sharply immediately post-CCVI but declined rapidly thereafter. Six months post-CCVI, 96.0% of caregivers and the same proportion of VSPs reported that vaccination was important and compatible with their religious beliefs. 82.7% and 88.2% of caregivers agreed that vaccines were safe and effective. 92.8% and 94.6% of VSPs agreed that vaccines were safe and effective. Both caregivers and VSPs reported an immediate decline in vaccine confidence post-CCVI. In most cases this trust was regained over time following government and public health responses, however some people remained hesitant about vaccinating their children. Many VSPs were overwhelmed by consultations, workload and psychological pressure after the CCVI.

conclusionAfter an initial decline, vaccine confidence recovered to pre-incident levels six months after the CCVI. However, some caregivers moved from the higher to the lower end of the vaccine confidence spectrum, pointing to the need to promote the acceptance of vaccination especially given the need for new vaccines to control the coronavirus epidemic.

Indexed as

Quality ControlSafety-Based Drug WithdrawalsAdultCaregiversChinaCross-Sectional StudiesDiphtheria-Tetanus-acellular Pertussis VaccinesFemaleHumansImmunization ProgramsMaleMedical StaffMiddle AgedRabies VaccinesSurveys and QuestionnairesTrustDiphtheria-Tetanus-acellular Pertussis VaccinesRabies VaccinesAcceptanceChinaConfidenceVaccineVaccine incident

Identifiers

PMID32912643
PMCPMC7476908

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.