Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32912564›Full record

Observational studyJournal of stroke and cerebrovascular diseases : the official journal of National Stroke Association2020

Clinician's Perception of Practice Changes for Stroke During the COVID-19 Pandemic.

Hera A Kamdar, Blake Senay, Shraddha Mainali, Vivien Lee, Deepak Kumar Gulati, Diana Greene-Chandos, Archana Hinduja, Tamara Strohm

Abstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Journal of stroke and cerebrovascular diseases : the official journal of National Stroke Association, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Hera A KamdarDepartment of Neurology, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio USA.
Blake SenayDepartment of Neurology, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio USA.
Shraddha MainaliDepartment of Neurology, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio USA.
Vivien LeeDepartment of Neurology, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio USA.
Deepak Kumar GulatiDepartment of Neurology, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio USA.
Diana Greene-ChandosDepartment of Neurology, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, New Mexico USA.
Archana HindujaDepartment of Neurology, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio USA.
Tamara StrohmDepartment of Neurology, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio USA. Electronic address: tamara.strohm@gmail.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundApproach to acute cerebrovascular disease management has evolved in the past few months to accommodate the rising needs of the 2019 novel coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic. In this study, we investigated the changes in practices and policies related to stroke care through an online survey.

methodsA 12 question, cross-sectional survey targeting practitioners involved in acute stroke care in the US was distributed electronically through national society surveys, social media and personal communication.

resultsRespondants from 39 states completed 206 surveys with the majority (82.5%) from comprehensive stroke centers. Approximately half stated some change in transport practices with 14 (7%) reporting significant reduction in transfers. Common strategies to limit healthcare provider exposure included using personal protective equipment (PPE) for all patients (127; 63.5%) as well as limiting the number of practitioners in the room (129; 64.5%). Most respondents (81%) noted an overall decrease in stroke volume. Many (34%) felt that the outcome or care of acute stroke patients had been impacted by COVID-19. This was associated with a change in hospital transport guidelines (OR 1.325, P = 0.047, 95% CI: 1.004-1.748), change in eligibility criteria for IV-tPA or mechanical thrombectomy (MT) (OR 3.146, P = 0.052, 95% CI: 0.988-10.017), and modified admission practices for post IV-tPA or MT patients (OR 2.141, P = 0.023, 95% CI: 1.110-4.132).

conclusionOur study highlights a change in practices and polices related to acute stroke management in response to COVID-19 which are variable among institutions. There is also a reported reduction in stroke volume across hospitals. Amongst these changes, updates in hospital transport guidelines and practices related to IV-tPA and MT may affect the perceived care and outcome of acute stroke patients.

Indexed as

Attitude of Health PersonnelHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeBetacoronavirusClinical Decision-MakingCoronavirus InfectionsCOVID-19Cross-Sectional StudiesDelivery of Health Care, IntegratedEligibility DeterminationHealth Care SurveysHost-Pathogen InteractionsHumansInfection ControlOccupational ExposurePandemicsPatient AdmissionAcute Ischemic StrokeCOVID-19Quality and OutcomesStroke management

Identifiers

PMID32912564
PMCPMC7375301

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.