ReviewJACC. Cardiovascular imaging2020
Proposed Requirements for Cardiovascular Imaging-Related Machine Learning Evaluation (PRIME): A Checklist: Reviewed by the American College of Cardiology Healthcare Innovation Council.
Review in JACC. Cardiovascular imaging, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 114 papers, 6 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
114 citing papers in PubMed, 6 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- PRIME 2.0: Proposed Requirements for Cardiovascular Imaging-Related Multimodal-AI Evaluation: An Updated Checklist.JACC. Cardiovascular imaging · 2026Guideline
- Machine learning for myocarditis diagnosis using cardiovascular magnetic resonance: a systematic review, diagnostic test accuracy meta-analysis, and comparison with human physicians.The international journal of cardiovascular imaging · 2025Pooled it
- Automated and reference methods for the calculation of left ventricular outflow tract velocity time integral or ejection fraction by non-cardiologists: a systematic review on the agreement of the two methods.Journal of clinical monitoring and computing · 2025Pooled it
- Artificial intelligence in the risk prediction models of cardiovascular disease and development of an independent validation screening tool: a systematic review.BMC medicine · 2024Pooled it
- APPRAISE-AI Tool for Quantitative Evaluation of AI Studies for Clinical Decision Support.JAMA network open · 2023Pooled it
- Automated Coronary Optical Coherence Tomography Feature Extraction with Application to Three-Dimensional Reconstruction.Tomography (Ann Arbor, Mich.) · 2022Pooled it
- Diagnostic Performance of AI-enabled Plaque Quantification from Coronary CT Angiography Compared with Intravascular Ultrasound.Radiology. Cardiothoracic imaging · 2024Trial
- Artificial Intelligence Reporting Guidelines in Radiology: A Systematic Review.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Artificial Intelligence in Echocardiography for Acute Coronary Syndromes: Current Evidence and Integration With Electrocardiography and Biomarkers.Echocardiography (Mount Kisco, N.Y.) · 2026Review
- Beyond E/e': A Physiology-Based Framework for Emerging Echocardiographic Biomarkers in the Noninvasive Assessment of Left Ventricular Filling Pressure.Echocardiography (Mount Kisco, N.Y.) · 2026Review
- Echo Chambers: Bias and Representation in Cardiac Imaging Datasets for Artificial Intelligence.Current cardiology reports · 2026Review
- Multichamber Myocardial Strain for Cardiovascular Risk Stratification in Liver Transplant Recipients Using Interpretable Machine Learning.JACC. Advances · 2026Article
- Echocardiographic Phenomapping in HFpEF: From Imaging Biomarkers to Precision Cardiovascular Medicine.Echocardiography (Mount Kisco, N.Y.) · 2026Review
- Mechanical signatures of left ventricular ejection fraction and mass index in a community cohort (ACE 1950).The international journal of cardiovascular imaging · 2026Article
- Evaluation Frameworks for Clinical AI Incorporating Validation Strategies, Real-World Applicability, and Ethical Principles: Scoping Review.Journal of medical Internet research · 2026Article
- Artificial intelligence in echocardiography: a position statement from the British Society of Echocardiography.Echo research and practice · 2026Review
- Ethical Considerations in Patient Privacy and Data Handling for AI in Cardiovascular Imaging and Radiology.Journal of imaging informatics in medicine · 2026Review
- Development and Validation of a Coronary Computed Tomography Angiography-Based Radiomics-Integrated Model for Noninvasive Detection of Left Atrial Appendage Thrombus in Atrial Fibrillation.Journal of the American Heart Association · 2026Article
- A Novel AAF-SwinT Model for Automatic Recognition of Abnormal Goat Lung Sounds.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2026Article
- Artificial intelligence-enhanced echocardiography in cardiovascular disease management.Nature reviews. Cardiology · 2026Review
54 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
24 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Machine learning (ML) has been increasingly used within cardiology, particularly in the domain of cardiovascular imaging. Due to the inherent complexity and flexibility of ML algorithms, inconsistencies in the model performance and interpretation may occur. Several review articles have been recently published that introduce the fundamental principles and clinical application of ML for cardiologists. This paper builds on these introductory principles and outlines a more comprehensive list of crucial responsibilities that need to be completed when developing ML models. This paper aims to serve as a scientific foundation to aid investigators, data scientists, authors, editors, and reviewers involved in machine learning research with the intent of uniform reporting of ML investigations. An independent multidisciplinary panel of ML experts, clinicians, and statisticians worked together to review the theoretical rationale underlying 7 sets of requirements that may reduce algorithmic errors and biases. Finally, the paper summarizes a list of reporting items as an itemized checklist that highlights steps for ensuring correct application of ML models and the consistent reporting of model specifications and results. It is expected that the rapid pace of research and development and the increased availability of real-world evidence may require periodic updates to the checklist.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.