Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32912374›Full record

ArticlePublic health nutrition2020

Comparison of food and beverage products' availability, variety, price and quality in German and US supermarkets.

Nanette Stroebele-Benschop, Kerstin Wolf, Katharine Palmer, Casey J Kelley, Stephanie B Jilcott Pitts

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Public health nutrition, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Nanette Stroebele-BenschopDepartment of Nutritional Psychology, Institute of Nutritional Medicine, University of Hohenheim, 70593Stuttgart, Germany.
Kerstin WolfDepartment of Nutritional Psychology, Institute of Nutritional Medicine, University of Hohenheim, 70593Stuttgart, Germany.
Katharine PalmerDepartment of Nutritional Psychology, Institute of Nutritional Medicine, University of Hohenheim, 70593Stuttgart, Germany.
Casey J KelleyDepartment of Public Health, East Carolina University, Greenville, NC, USA.
Stephanie B Jilcott PittsDepartment of Public Health, East Carolina University, Greenville, NC, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo assess availability, variety, price and quality of different food products in a convenience sample of supermarkets in Germany and the USA.

designCross-sectional study using an adapted version of the Bridging the Gap Food Store Observation Form.

settingInformation on availability, quality, price and variety of selected food products in eight German and seven US supermarkets (discount and full service) was obtained and compared by country.

resultsA general tendency for lower prices of fruits and vegetables in Germany was observed, while produce quality and variety did not seem to differ between countries, with the exception of the variety of some vegetables such as tomatoes. Chips and cereals did not differ significantly in variety nor price. In both countries, high energy-dense foods were lower in energy costs than lower energy-dense foods.

conclusionsThe influence of food prices and availability on consumption should be further explored, including the impact of country differences.

Indexed as

Food MarketsFood SupplyBeveragesCommerceCross-Sectional StudiesFoodFruitGermanyHumansVegetablesFruitsPriceProduct availabilitySupermarketVarietyVegetables

Identifiers

PMID32912374
PMCPMC7737043

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.