Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32912274›Full record

ArticleBreast cancer research : BCR2020

A phase 1b study evaluating the effect of elacestrant treatment on estrogen receptor availability and estradiol binding to the estrogen receptor in metastatic breast cancer lesions using

Agnes Jager, Elisabeth G E de Vries, C Willemien Menke-van der Houven van Oordt, Patrick Neven, Clasina M Venema, Andor W J M Glaudemans, Yamei Wang, Rebecca G Bagley, Maureen G Conlan, Philippe Aftimos

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase IMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in Breast cancer research : BCR, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02650817 (A Phase IB Study to Evaluate the Effect of RAD1901 on the Availability of Estrogen Receptor Binding Sites in Metastatic Breast Cancer Lesions Using 16α-18F-Fluoro-17β-Estradiol Positron Emission Tomography Imaging), which is not on this map. Cited by 22 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02650817 phase1completednot on this map

A Phase IB Study to Evaluate the Effect of RAD1901 on the Availability of Estrogen Receptor Binding Sites in Metastatic Breast Cancer Lesions Using 16α-18F-Fluoro-17β-Estradiol Positron Emission Tomography Imaging

TypeinterventionalSponsorStemline Therapeutics, Inc.Ran2016 to 2019Enrolled16ConditionsMetastatic Breast CancerArmsRAD1901
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 48 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. [EJNMMI research · 2025
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Cancers · 2023
    Review
  13. Pharmacology and pharmacokinetics of elacestrant.Cancer chemotherapy and pharmacology · 2023
    Article
  14. An Open-label Phase I Study of GDC-0927 in Postmenopausal Women with Locally Advanced or Metastatic Estrogen Receptor-Positive Breast Cancer.Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research · 2023
    Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Phase I Study of Elacestrant (RAD1901), a Novel Selective Estrogen Receptor Degrader, in ER-Positive, HER2-Negative Advanced Breast Cancer.Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 6 institutions in 3 countries.

Agnes JagerErasmus MC Cancer Institute, Post Office Box 2040, 3000 CA, Rotterdam, Netherlands.
Elisabeth G E de VriesUniversity Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Hanzeplein 1, 9713 GZ, Groningen, Netherlands.
C Willemien Menke-van der Houven van OordtAmsterdam UMC location VUMC, Cancer Center Amsterdam, De Boelelaan 1118, 1081 HV, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
Patrick NevenUZ KU-Leuven, Herestraat 49, 3000, Leuven, Belgium.
Clasina M VenemaUniversity Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Hanzeplein 1, 9713 GZ, Groningen, Netherlands.
Andor W J M GlaudemansUniversity Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Hanzeplein 1, 9713 GZ, Groningen, Netherlands.
Yamei WangRadius Health, Inc., 950 Winter Street, Waltham, MA, 02451, USA.
Rebecca G BagleyRadius Health, Inc., 950 Winter Street, Waltham, MA, 02451, USA.
Maureen G ConlanRadius Health, Inc., 950 Winter Street, Waltham, MA, 02451, USA. mconlan@radiuspharm.com.ORCID 0000-0002-0298-9866
Philippe AftimosClinical Trials Conduct Unit, Institut Jules Bordet - Université Libre de Bruxelles, Rue Héger-Bordet 1, 1000, Brussels, Belgium.
Radius Health (United States) · USUniversity Medical Center Groningen · NLAmsterdam University Medical Centers · NLErasmus MC Cancer Institute · NLKU Leuven · BEUniversité Libre de Bruxelles · BE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundElacestrant is an oral selective estrogen receptor (ER) degrader. This phase 1b open-label, non-randomized study (RAD1901-106) was initiated to determine the effect of elacestrant on the availability of ER in lesions from postmenopausal women with ER+ advanced breast cancer (ABC) using 16α-

methodsEligible patients were postmenopausal women with ER+, HER2- ABC; tumor progression after ≥ 6 months of 1-3 lines of endocrine treatment for ABC; and measurable or evaluable disease. Two 8-patient cohorts were enrolled: one treated with 400 mg elacestrant once daily (QD) and one treated with 200 mg elacestrant QD with dose escalation to 400 mg QD after 14 days. Elacestrant was dosed continuously until progressive disease, toxicity, or withdrawal. FES-PET/CT was performed pre-dose at baseline and 4 h post-dose on day 14. The primary endpoint was the percentage difference in FES uptake in tumor lesions (maximum 20) after 14 days of treatment compared to baseline. Overall response was investigator-assessed by Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors [RECIST] version 1.1.

resultsPatients (n = 16; median age, 53.5 years) had ABC with a median 2.5 prior lines of endocrine therapy. Median reduction in tumor FES uptake from baseline to day 14 was 89.1% (Q1, Q3: 75.1%, 94.1%) and was similar in both cohorts (89.1% [Q1, Q3: 67.4%, 94.2%], 200/400 mg and 88.7% [Q1, Q3: 79.5%, 94.1%], 400 mg). Residual ER availability (> 25% persistence in FES uptake) on day 14 was observed in 3 patients receiving 200/400 mg (3/78, 37.5%) and 1 patient receiving 400 mg (1/8, 12.5%). The overall response rate (ORR) was 11.1% (1 partial response), and clinical benefit rate (CBR) was 30.8%. Median percentage change in FES uptake did not correlate with ORR or CBR. Adverse events occurring in > 20% of the patients were nausea (68.8%), fatigue (50.0%), dyspepsia (43.8%), vomiting (37.5%), and decreased appetite, dysphagia, and hot flush (31.3% each). Most events were grade 2 in severity.

conclusionElacestrant 200 mg and 400 mg QD greatly reduced ER availability measured by FES-PET/CT. In a heavily pretreated population, elacestrant was associated with antitumor activity.

trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02650817 . Registered on 08 January 2016.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAged, 80 and overBreast NeoplasmsEstradiolFemaleFluorine RadioisotopesHumansMiddle AgedNeoplasm MetastasisPatient SafetyPositron Emission Tomography Computed TomographyRadiopharmaceuticalsReceptors, EstrogenSelective Estrogen Receptor ModulatorsTetrahydronaphthalenesEstradiolFluorine-18Fluorine RadioisotopesRAD1901RadiopharmaceuticalsReceptors, EstrogenSelective Estrogen Receptor ModulatorsTetrahydronaphthalenes16α-18F-fluoro-17β-estradiol (FES)Advanced breast cancerElacestrantEndocrine therapyEstrogen receptorHormonal therapyMetastatic breast cancerPositron emission tomography (PET)RAD1901

Identifiers

PMID32912274
PMCPMC7488419
OpenAlexW3085105079

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.