Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32912266›Full record

ArticleActa veterinaria Scandinavica2020

Ocular ultrasonography of sea turtles.

Caterina Muramoto, Vinícius Cardoso-Brito, Ana Cláudia Raposo, Thais Torres Pires, Arianne Pontes Oriá

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Acta veterinaria Scandinavica, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 28% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Caterina MuramotoSchool of Veterinary Medicine and Zootechny, Federal University of Bahia, Avenida Adhemar de Barros, 500, Ondina, Salvador, BA, 40170-110, Brazil.
Vinícius Cardoso-BritoSchool of Veterinary Medicine and Zootechny, Federal University of Bahia, Avenida Adhemar de Barros, 500, Ondina, Salvador, BA, 40170-110, Brazil.
Ana Cláudia RaposoSchool of Veterinary Medicine and Zootechny, Federal University of Bahia, Avenida Adhemar de Barros, 500, Ondina, Salvador, BA, 40170-110, Brazil.
Thais Torres PiresFundação Pró-Tamar, Rua Rubens Guelli 134/ 307, Itaigara, Salvador, Bahia, 41815-135, Brazil.
Arianne Pontes OriáSchool of Veterinary Medicine and Zootechny, Federal University of Bahia, Avenida Adhemar de Barros, 500, Ondina, Salvador, BA, 40170-110, Brazil. arianneoria@ufba.br.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5093-6841
Universidade Federal da Bahia · BRFundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado da Bahia · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundEnvironmental changes contribute to the development of ophthalmic diseases in sea turtles, but information on their eye biometrics is scarce. The aim of this study was to describe ophthalmic ultrasonographic features of four different sea turtle species; Caretta caretta (Loggerhead turtle; n = 10), Chelonia mydas (Green turtle; n = 8), Eretmochelys imbricata (Hawksbill turtle; n = 8) and Lepidochelys olivacea (Olive ridley; n = 6) under human care. Corneal thickness, scleral ossicle width and thickness, anterior chamber depth, axial length of the lens, vitreous chamber depth and axial globe length were measured by B-mode sonography with a linear transducer. Carapace size and animal weight were recorded. A sonographic description of the eye structures was established.

resultsThe four species presented an ovate eyeball, a relatively thin cornea, and a small-sized lens positioned rostrally in the eye bulb, near the cornea, resulting in a shallow anterior chamber. The scleral ossicles did not prevent the evaluation of intraocular structures, even with a rotated eye or closed eyelids; image formation beyond the ossicles and measurements of all proposed structures were possible. B-mode sonography was easily performed in all animals studied. The sonographic characteristics of the eye were similar among the four species. Since there was a correlation between the size of the eye structures and the size of the individual, especially its carapace size, the differences found between E. imbricata and Caretta caretta are believed to be due to their overall difference in size.

conclusionsSonography is a valuable tool in ophthalmic evaluation of these species. Only minor differences were found between the species in this study, reinforcing their phylogenetic proximity and their similar functions and habitats.

Indexed as

AnimalsAnimals, ZooBrazilEyeReference ValuesSpecies SpecificityTurtlesUltrasonographyCaretta carettaChelonia mydasEretmochelys imbricateEyeLepidochelys olivaceaUltrasound

Identifiers

PMID32912266
PMCPMC7488042
OpenAlexW3085401751

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.