Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32912233›Full record

ArticleHealth and quality of life outcomes2020

Quality of life and factors affecting it in patients with Alzheimer's disease: a cross-sectional study.

Burcu Akpınar Söylemez, Özlem Küçükgüçlü, Merve Aliye Akyol, Ahmet Turan Işık

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health and quality of life outcomes, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Health-Related Quality of Life among Older Adults with Dementia Living in Vietnamese Nursing Homes.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2024
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Burcu Akpınar SöylemezDepartment of Internal Medicine Nursing, Dokuz Eylul University Faculty of Nursing, Inciralti, Izmir, Turkey. burcu.akpinar@deu.edu.tr.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9643-0325
Özlem KüçükgüçlüDepartment of Internal Medicine Nursing, Dokuz Eylul University Faculty of Nursing, Inciralti, Izmir, Turkey.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4771-1091
Merve Aliye AkyolDepartment of Internal Medicine Nursing, Dokuz Eylul University Faculty of Nursing, Inciralti, Izmir, Turkey.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5107-266X
Ahmet Turan IşıkDepartment of Geriatrics, Dokuz Eylül University, Faculty of Medicine, İzmir, Turkey.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5867-6503
Dokuz Eylül University · TR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundQuality of life (QoL) is a growing area of interest in dementia research. However, it remains a controversial topic. This study aimed to determine the QoL of people with Alzheimer's disease (PwAD) and investigate the factors affecting patients' and caregivers' QoL scores.

methodsA cross-sectional study design was used. A total of 98 home-dwelling PwADs and their primary caregivers were recruited in the study. Sociodemographic characteristics and QoL scores, activities of daily living (ADL) and instrumental ADL (IADL), Mini-mental State Examination (MMSE) scores, neuropsychiatric inventory (NPI), and NPI-distress were determined to assess the relevant outcomes. All statistical analyses were performed using SPSS version 22.0. Descriptive statistics, t-test, Pearson correlation, and multinomial regression were used for analysis.

resultsThe patients' ratings of their QoL were higher than those of the caregivers. Caregiver education, patients' ADL, and IADL were associated with the patients' score on the Quality of Life in Alzheimer's Disease (QoL-AD) scale. In addition to these variables, MMSE, NPI, and NPI-distress were associated with the caregiver scores on QoL-AD.

conclusionFrom a clinical point of view, the proxy-rated scores of QoL cannot replace the self-ratings of the patients. This study suggests that both self- and proxy-rated QoL scores should be applied whenever possible. Focusing on the management of behavioral problems and supporting functionality and cognitive functions may be modifiable factors that may represent targets for intervention to improve the QoL. The findings of this study should also be used to design caregiver educational programs about the determinants of QoL.

Indexed as

Quality of LifeActivities of Daily LivingAgedAged, 80 and overAlzheimer DiseaseCaregiversCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansMaleMental Status and Dementia TestsMiddle AgedAlzheimer’s diseaseCaregiversProxyQuality of life

Identifiers

PMID32912233
PMCPMC7488137
OpenAlexW3084166919

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.