ArticleBMC health services research2020
Developing a consolidated research framework for clinical allied health professionals practising in the UK.
Article in BMC health services research, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
21 citing papers in PubMed, 55 citations in OpenAlex.
- Evaluating the need to revise chiropractic education standards in the United Kingdom: Adapting to progress.The Journal of chiropractic education · 2026Article
- Early career research capacity-building for the health and social care workforce: process evaluation of internships and fellowships provided through a research-practice partnership.Health research policy and systems · 2026Article
- Developing a cross-organisational physiotherapy-specific critical care competency framework to enable collaborative working: an overview of the integration journey across an academic health science centre.BMC health services research · 2025Article
- Demonstrating impact of allied health professional participation in the NIHR Associate Principal Investigator scheme.BMC health services research · 2025Article
- Study characteristics and methods in a national nursing and allied health research programme: A descriptive study.International nursing review · 2025Observational
- Core capabilities of Chinese centers for disease control and prevention public health personnel: a network analysis from Northeast China.BMC medical education · 2025Article
- A qualitative study investigating research priorities and investigative capacity in sports-focused chiropractic research, part 2: exploring the challenges and opportunities for research capacity development.The Journal of the Canadian Chiropractic Association · 2024Article
- Review
- Evaluating the perceived impact and legacy of master's degree level research in the allied health professions: a UK-wide cross-sectional survey.BMC medical education · 2024Article
- Understanding the value of a doctorate for allied health professionals in practice in the UK: a survey.BMC health services research · 2024Article
- Public and professional involvement in a systematic review investigating the impact of occupational therapy on the self-management of rheumatoid arthritis.The British journal of occupational therapy · 2024Article
- The health service perspective on determinants of success in allied health student research project collaborations: a qualitative study guided by the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research.BMC health services research · 2024Article
- Research priority setting in UK podiatric surgery.Journal of foot and ankle research · 2023Article
- Development of a framework and research impact capture tool for nursing, midwifery, allied health professions, healthcare science, pharmacy and psychology (NMAHPPs).BMC health services research · 2023Article
- Developing a clinical academic career pathway in a Community and Mental Health NHS Trust.Journal of research in nursing : JRN · 2023Article
- Allied health professionals' perceptions of research in the United Kingdom national health service: a survey of research capacity and culture.BMC health services research · 2022Article
- Experiences of hospital allied health professionals in collaborative student research projects: a qualitative study.BMC health services research · 2022Article
- Translation, Adaptation, and Psychometric Validation of the Spanish Version of the Attitudes towards Research and Development within Nursing Questionnaire.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022Article
- Representations of Research among Newly Graduated Paramedical Professionals: A Qualitative Study.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021Article
- Effectiveness of an Academic-Practice Team Approach on Research Capacity Building of Nurses and Public Health Professionals.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundAllied Health Professionals (AHPs) form a significant part of the healthcare workforce and have great potential to improve services through research and research-informed practice. However, there is a lack of tradition in research embedded in practice in these professional groups. Barriers include clinical caseload pressures, a lack of sustainable training and consequent lack of confidence in practitioners. Practice managers are ill-equipped to monitor and guide staff research development. The modern healthcare system is a multi-disciplinary environment focused on the needs of the patient. A common framework across all AHP disciplines, offering equality in research knowledge and skills and shared language, might be helpful in planning and developing clinical career pathways. Our aim is to develop a consolidated research framework to help AHPs to plan and guide research activity throughout their career.
methodsThe study was conducted in three phases. Phase one identified existing AHP research frameworks (AHPRF) through expert consultations and literature searches. Phase two involved framework analysis of the AHPRFs to develop a single consolidated framework. Phase three included a workshop with experts to validate and adapt the framework for practice.
resultsNineteen AHPRFs were identified. A consolidated framework was shaped by analysis of the AHPRFs resulting in a consolidated framework of eight sections, each containing a series of statements. Each section relates to an analytic theme within the framework analysis, and the statements were based on sub-categories of themes. The final framework was further shaped by the phase three workshop into a set of 'stem' statements that can be adapted to reflect different levels of expertise and the inclusion of a set of guiding principles developed through expert consultation.
conclusionThe consolidated framework was entitled 'Shaping Better Practice Through Research: A Practitioner Framework' by stakeholders, thus emphasising its ambition to embed research activity into practice. It instigates a new perspective within AHP research by offering practitioners and managers a tool that can be applied across public, private, and voluntary settings for AHPs in all disciplines. Its ambition is to develop capacity in the AHPs that can undertake research to improve services and the health of service users.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.