Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32912192›Full record

ArticleBMC geriatrics2020

Antibiotic prescribing and non-prescribing in nursing home residents with signs and symptoms ascribed to urinary tract infection (ANNA): study protocol for a cluster randomized controlled trial.

Jeanine J S Rutten, Laura W van Buul, Martin Smalbrugge, Suzanne E Geerlings, Debby L Gerritsen, Stephanie Natsch, Philip D Sloane, Ruth B Veenhuizen, Johannes C van der Wouden, Cees M P M Hertogh

Open access · goldAbstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in BMC geriatrics, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Jeanine J S RuttenDepartment of Medicine for Older People, Amsterdam University Medical Center, Vrije Universiteit, Van der Boechorststraat 7, 1081, BT, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Laura W van BuulDepartment of Medicine for Older People, Amsterdam University Medical Center, Vrije Universiteit, Van der Boechorststraat 7, 1081, BT, Amsterdam, the Netherlands. L.vanbuul@amsterdamumc.nl.ORCID 0000-0001-8753-3464
Martin SmalbruggeDepartment of Medicine for Older People, Amsterdam University Medical Center, Vrije Universiteit, Van der Boechorststraat 7, 1081, BT, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Suzanne E GeerlingsDepartment of Internal Medicine, Infectious Diseases division, Amsterdam University Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Debby L GerritsenDepartment of Primary and Community care, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Radboudumc Alzheimer Center, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.
Stephanie NatschDepartment of Pharmacy, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.
Philip D SloaneDepartment of Family Medicine, School of Medicine, and the Cecil G. Sheps Center for Health Services Research, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.
Ruth B VeenhuizenDepartment of Medicine for Older People, Amsterdam University Medical Center, Vrije Universiteit, Van der Boechorststraat 7, 1081, BT, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Johannes C van der WoudenDepartment of Medicine for Older People, Amsterdam University Medical Center, Vrije Universiteit, Van der Boechorststraat 7, 1081, BT, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Cees M P M HertoghDepartment of Medicine for Older People, Amsterdam University Medical Center, Vrije Universiteit, Van der Boechorststraat 7, 1081, BT, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Radboud University Nijmegen · NLUniversity of Amsterdam · NLUniversity of North Carolina at Chapel Hill · USVrije Universiteit Amsterdam · NL

Funding

ZonMw 839120008
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAntibiotic overprescribing for suspected urinary tract infection (UTI) in nursing homes (NHs) is common. Typical clinical scenarios in which antibiotics are inappropriately prescribed include response to nonspecific signs and symptoms and/or a positive urine test in the absence of symptoms referable to the urinary tract. These and other scenarios for inappropriate antibiotic prescribing were addressed in a recent international Delphi study which resulted in the development of a decision tool for the empiric treatment of UTI in frail older adults. The aim of the current study is to implement this decision tool, by integrating it into the electronic health record (EHR) and providing education on its content and use, and to evaluate its effect on appropriate antibiotic prescribing. An additional aim is to evaluate the quality of the intervention and the implementation process.

methodsA cluster Randomized Controlled Trial (cRCT) is conducted in sixteen NHs and aims to include 897 residents diagnosed with suspected UTI. NHs in the intervention group use the EHR-integrated decision tool, and receive education for physicians and nursing staff; in the control group care as usual is provided. Data is collected through case report forms within the EHR at the day of diagnosis and at 3, 7, and 21 days thereafter. The primary outcome is appropriate antibiotic prescribing for suspected UTI at the day of diagnosis. Secondary outcomes include the course of symptoms, alternative diagnoses, treatment changes, complications, hospitalization, and mortality. Data on total antibiotic prescribing are additionally collected in the participating NHs 12 months before and during the study. Finally, the process evaluation combines cRCT data with questionnaires and qualitative interviews with NH professionals. DISCUSSION: This is the first cRCT to evaluate the recently developed, international decision tool for empiric treatment of suspected UTI in NH residents. Study findings will elucidate the effect of the intervention on appropriate antibiotic prescribing for suspected UTI, and provide insight into the applicability of the decision tool in NHs in general and in specific subgroups of NH residents. With this study we aim to contribute to antibiotic stewardship efforts in long-term care.

trial registrationThe ANNA study was registered at the Netherlands Trial Register on 26 February 2019, with identification number NTR NL7555 .

Indexed as

Anti-Bacterial AgentsAntimicrobial StewardshipDrug UtilizationInappropriate PrescribingNursing HomesRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicUrinary Tract InfectionsAgedAged, 80 and overFemaleHumansLong-Term CareMaleNetherlandsPractice Patterns, Physicians'Anti-Bacterial AgentsAntibiotic prescribingAntibiotic stewardshipDecision supportNursing homesRandomized controlled trialUrinary tract infection

Identifiers

PMID32912192
PMCPMC7488520
OpenAlexW3085534485

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.