Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32912183›Full record

ArticleBMC psychiatry2020

Validation of the PHQ-9 depression scale in Ethiopian cancer patients attending the oncology clinic at Tikur Anbessa specialized hospital.

Mikyas Degefa, Benyam Dubale, Fikirte Bayouh, Biniyam Ayele, Yared Zewde

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC psychiatry, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 43 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
43citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

43 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 68 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Improving Depression Screening in Adult Patients With Cancer.Journal of the advanced practitioner in oncology · 2024
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Mikyas DegefaAmanuel Mental Specialized Hospital, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia. mikyas101@gmail.com.
Benyam DubaleDepartment of Pyschiatry, College of Health Science, Addis Ababa University, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.
Fikirte BayouhDepartment of Pyschiatry, College of Health Science, Addis Ababa University, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.
Biniyam AyeleDepartment of Neurology, College of Health Science, Addis Ababa University, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.
Yared ZewdeDepartment of Neurology, College of Health Science, Addis Ababa University, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.
Addis Ababa University · ET

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAlthough depression is highly prevalent among cancer patients, it is often underdiagnosed and poorly managed particularly in developing nations. These shortcomings can have substantial adverse effects not only on the disease prognosis but also on patients' quality of life. The Patient Health Questionnaire-9 is a widely used depression screening tool but it has not been validated among patients with chronic illnesses such as cancer in Ethiopia. We aim to validate the PHQ-9 among Ethiopian cancer patients in an outpatient setting.

methodsA cross-sectional study was conducted among cancer patients attending the oncology clinic at Tikur Anbessa Specialized Hospital (TASH). We assessed criterion validity and performance of the PHQ-9 test against the gold standard Mini-International Neuropsychiatric Interview (MINI) diagnostic tool among patients with cancer. The MINI was administered by psychiatric nurses who were blind to the initial PHQ-9 screening tool.

resultsA total of 163 patients completed the 2 stages of a diagnostic interview in the study. The majority (64%) of the participants were women, the mean age was 46 (13.5) years. Using the gold standard MINI test the prevalence of Major Depressive Episode (MDE) was 15%. The internal consistency (Cronbach's α) for PHQ-9 was 0.78 suggesting good (acceptable) internal consistency for the reliability of the test scores. When the total PHQ-9 score was used to identify cases of MDE, the Area under the Curve (AUC) was 0.93 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.88-0.97) on Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) analysis. This shows evidence for the excellent discriminating power of the PHQ-9 between cases and non-cases of MDE. At cutoff point ≥4, the PHQ-9 had a sensitivity of 88% and specificity of 78.1% on the ROC curve to detect MDE.

conclusionPHQ-9 is a reliable and valid instrument to detect MDE among individuals with chronic conditions such as cancer patients in outpatient settings and it can be used in resource-limited settings for early diagnosis and proper therapy of such patients.

Indexed as

Major Depressive DisorderNeoplasmsCross-Sectional StudiesDepressionEthiopiaFemaleHospitalsHumansMass ScreeningMiddle AgedPatient Health QuestionnaireQuality of LifeReproducibility of ResultsSensitivity and SpecificitySurveys and QuestionnairesCancerDepressionEthiopiaPatient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9)Validation

Identifiers

PMID32912183
PMCPMC7488004
OpenAlexW3083932823

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.