Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32912174›Full record

ArticleBMC pulmonary medicine2020

Real-world treatment patterns and survival outcomes for advanced non-small cell lung cancer in the pre-immunotherapy era in Portugal: a retrospective analysis from the I-O Optimise initiative.

Marta Soares, Luís Antunes, Patrícia Redondo, Marina Borges, Ruben Hermans, Dony Patel, Fiona Grimson, Robin Munro, Carlos Chaib, Laure Lacoin and 5 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC pulmonary medicine, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 29 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Observational
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 5 institutions in 4 countries.

Marta SoaresDepartment of Medical Oncology, Portuguese Oncology Institute of Porto (IPO-Porto), Rua Dr. Antonio Bernardino de Almeida, 4200-072, Porto, Portugal. martasoares@ipoporto.min-saude.pt.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6071-3673
Luís AntunesCancer Epidemiology Group, IPO Porto Research Center (CI-IPOP), Portuguese Oncology Institute of Porto (IPO-Porto), Porto, Portugal.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3098-0711
Patrícia RedondoOutcomes Research Lab, Portuguese Oncology Institute of Porto (IPO-Porto), Porto, Portugal.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8560-1646
Marina BorgesOutcomes Research Lab, Portuguese Oncology Institute of Porto (IPO-Porto), Porto, Portugal.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8073-6506
Ruben HermansReal World Solutions, IQVIA, London, UK.
Dony PatelReal World Solutions, IQVIA, London, UK.
Fiona GrimsonReal World Solutions, IQVIA, London, UK.
Robin MunroReal World Solutions, IQVIA, London, UK.
Carlos ChaibR&D Medical Affairs, Bristol Myers Squibb, Madrid, Spain.
Laure LacoinEpi-Fit, Bordeaux, Nouvelle-Aquitaine, France.
Melinda DaumontWorldwide Health Economics & Outcomes Research, Bristol Myers Squibb, Braine-l'Alleud, Belgium.
John R PenrodWorldwide Health Economics & Outcomes Research, Bristol Myers Squibb, Princeton, NJ, USA.
John C O'DonnellWorldwide Health Economics & Outcomes Research, Bristol Myers Squibb, Princeton, NJ, USA.
Maria José BentoCancer Epidemiology Group, IPO Porto Research Center (CI-IPOP), Portuguese Oncology Institute of Porto (IPO-Porto), Porto, Portugal.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7690-9830
Francisco Rocha GonçalvesMEDCIDS, Faculty of Medicine, University of Porto, Porto, Portugal.
Instituto Português de Oncologia Francisco Gentil · PTIQVIA (United Kingdom) · GBBristol-Myers Squibb (United States) · USUniversidade do Porto · PTBristol-Myers Squibb (Belgium) · BE

Funding

Bristol-Myers Squibb Company N/A
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAs part of the multinational I-O Optimise research initiative, this retrospective cohort study of patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) evaluated real-world treatment patterns and survival prior to immunotherapy reimbursement in Portugal.

methodsThis study utilized a database held by IPO-Porto, Portugal's largest oncology hospital. Adult patients diagnosed with stage IIIB or IV NSCLC from January 2012 to December 2016 at IPO-Porto, with follow-up to June 2017, were included. Treatment analyses were performed from 2015 onwards. Kaplan-Meier methods were used for overall survival (OS). Factors associated with OS and systemic anti-cancer therapy (SACT) treatment were assessed using multivariate statistical models.

resultsOf 1524 patients diagnosed with NSCLC at IPO-Porto, 1008 patients had advanced disease (stage IIIB: 10.1%, 154/1524, stage IV: 56.0%, 854/1524). For those with advanced disease, median age was 65 years (range: 21-92) and 75.6% (762/1008) were male. Median OS (interquartile range [IQR]) was 11.4 (5.2-26.9) months for stage IIIB and 6.3 (2.4-15.0) months for stage IV. Factors associated with decreased risk of death included female sex and epidermal growth factor receptor gene (EGFR)/anaplastic lymphoma kinase gene (ALK) mutations/rearrangements; factors associated with increased risk of death included older age and stage IV disease. Among patients diagnosed in 2015 or 2016, 75.8% (297/392) received ≥1 line of SACT. Platinum-based chemotherapy was the most common first-line therapy (non-squamous cell carcinoma [NSQ]: 72.9%; squamous cell carcinoma [SQ] 87.3%, 55/63; patients with EGFR/ALK mutations/rearrangements primarily received tyrosine kinase inhibitors). The likelihood of receiving SACT was lower in older patients and those diagnosed with stage IV disease. Patients not receiving SACT had poor survival outcomes (median OS [IQR]: NSQ, 1.8 [1.1-3.1] months; SQ, 2.3 (1.3-3.4) months), while median OS (IQR) in SACT-treated patients was 12.6 (6.1-24.5) months for NSQ and 10.3 (5.7-15.9) months for SQ.

conclusionsThis real-world data analysis from a large Portuguese oncology hospital demonstrates a high disease burden for advanced NSCLC in the pre-immunotherapy era, with nearly one-quarter of patients not receiving SACT. Even in patients receiving SACT, median survival was only about 1 year.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAged, 80 and overCarcinoma, Non-Small-Cell LungCohort StudiesFemaleHumansImmunotherapyLung NeoplasmsMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasm StagingPortugalPractice Patterns, Physicians'Retrospective StudiesSurvival RateI-O OptimiseNon-small cell lung cancerOverall survivalReal-world evidence

Identifiers

PMID32912174
PMCPMC7488009
OpenAlexW3083931508

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.