Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32911867›Full record

ReviewMaterials (Basel, Switzerland)2020

Recent Trends in Three-Dimensional Bioinks Based on Alginate for Biomedical Applications.

Farnoosh Pahlevanzadeh, Hamidreza Mokhtari, Hamid Reza Bakhsheshi-Rad, Rahmatollah Emadi, Mahshid Kharaziha, Ali Valiani, S Ali Poursamar, Ahmad Fauzi Ismail, Seeram RamaKrishna, Filippo Berto

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Materials (Basel, Switzerland), 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Polysaccharide-based biomaterials in a journey from 3D to 4D printing.Bioengineering & translational medicine · 2023
    Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. 3D Bioprinting Technology and Hydrogels Used in the Process.Journal of functional biomaterials · 2022
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Farnoosh PahlevanzadehDepartment of Materials Engineering, Isfahan University of Technology, Isfahan 84156-83111, Iran.
Hamidreza MokhtariDepartment of Materials Engineering, Isfahan University of Technology, Isfahan 84156-83111, Iran.
Hamid Reza Bakhsheshi-RadAdvanced Materials Research Center, Department of Materials Engineering, Najafabad Branch, Islamic Azad University, Najafabad, Iran.
Rahmatollah EmadiDepartment of Materials Engineering, Isfahan University of Technology, Isfahan 84156-83111, Iran.
Mahshid KharazihaDepartment of Materials Engineering, Isfahan University of Technology, Isfahan 84156-83111, Iran.ORCID 0000-0002-5782-8007
Ali ValianiDepartment of Anatomical Science, School of Medicine, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan 81746-73461, Iran.
S Ali PoursamarBiomaterials, Nanotechnology, and Tissue Engineering Group, Advanced Medical Technology Department, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan 81746-73461, Iran.ORCID 0000-0002-9824-0947
Ahmad Fauzi IsmailAdvanced Membrane Technology Research Center (AMTEC), Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, Skudai 81310, Johor Bahru, Johor, Malaysia.
Seeram RamaKrishnaDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, National University of Singapore, 9 Engineering Drive 1, Singapore 117576, Singapore.ORCID 0000-0001-8479-8686
Filippo BertoDepartment of Mechanical and Industrial Engineering, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, 7491 Trondheim, Norway.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Three-dimensional (3D) bioprinting is an appealing and revolutionary manufacturing approach for the accurate placement of biologics, such as living cells and extracellular matrix (ECM) components, in the form of a 3D hierarchical structure to fabricate synthetic multicellular tissues. Many synthetic and natural polymers are applied as cell printing bioinks. One of them, alginate (Alg), is an inexpensive biomaterial that is among the most examined hydrogel materials intended for vascular, cartilage, and bone tissue printing. It has also been studied pertaining to the liver, kidney, and skin, due to its excellent cell response and flexible gelation preparation through divalent ions including calcium. Nevertheless, Alg hydrogels possess certain negative aspects, including weak mechanical characteristics, poor printability, poor structural stability, and poor cell attachment, which may restrict its usage along with the 3D printing approach to prepare artificial tissue. In this review paper, we prepare the accessible materials to be able to encourage and boost new Alg-based bioink formulations with superior characteristics for upcoming purposes in drug delivery systems. Moreover, the major outcomes are discussed, and the outstanding concerns regarding this area and the scope for upcoming examination are outlined.

Indexed as

3D bioprintingalginatebiofabricationbioinksbiomaterialscell-biomaterial interactionnatural polymersregenerative medicinetissue engineering

Identifiers

PMID32911867
PMCPMC7557490

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.