Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32911861›Full record

ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2020

A Wearable Stethoscope for Long-Term Ambulatory Respiratory Health Monitoring.

Gürkan Yilmaz, Michaël Rapin, Diogo Pessoa, Bruno M Rocha, Antonio Moreira de Sousa, Roberto Rusconi, Paulo Carvalho, Josias Wacker, Rui Pedro Paiva, Olivier Chételat

Open access · goldAbstract readComparative StudyEvaluation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed
3.9field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 50 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. [Improving adaptive noise reduction performance of body sound auscultation through linear preprocessing].Sheng wu yi xue gong cheng xue za zhi = Journal of biomedical engineering = Shengwu yixue gongchengxue zazhi · 2024
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Gürkan YilmazSwiss Center for Electronics and Microtechnology (CSEM), 2002 Neuchâtel, Switzerland.
Michaël RapinSwiss Center for Electronics and Microtechnology (CSEM), 2002 Neuchâtel, Switzerland.
Diogo PessoaUniversity of Coimbra, Centre for Informatics and Systems of the University of Coimbra, Department of Informatics Engineering, 3030-290 Coimbra, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0002-7783-7488
Bruno M RochaUniversity of Coimbra, Centre for Informatics and Systems of the University of Coimbra, Department of Informatics Engineering, 3030-290 Coimbra, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0003-1643-667X
Antonio Moreira de SousaSwiss Center for Electronics and Microtechnology (CSEM), 2002 Neuchâtel, Switzerland.
Roberto RusconiSwiss Center for Electronics and Microtechnology (CSEM), 2002 Neuchâtel, Switzerland.
Paulo CarvalhoUniversity of Coimbra, Centre for Informatics and Systems of the University of Coimbra, Department of Informatics Engineering, 3030-290 Coimbra, Portugal.
Josias WackerSwiss Center for Electronics and Microtechnology (CSEM), 2002 Neuchâtel, Switzerland.
Rui Pedro PaivaUniversity of Coimbra, Centre for Informatics and Systems of the University of Coimbra, Department of Informatics Engineering, 3030-290 Coimbra, Portugal.
Olivier ChételatSwiss Center for Electronics and Microtechnology (CSEM), 2002 Neuchâtel, Switzerland.
Swiss Center for Electronics and Microtechnology (Switzerland) · CHUniversity of Coimbra · PT

Funding

Fundação para a Ciência e Tecnologia (FCT) Ph.D. scholarship SFRH/BD/135686/2018H2020-ICT-2018-2 825572
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Lung sounds acquired by stethoscopes are extensively used in diagnosing and differentiating respiratory diseases. Although an extensive know-how has been built to interpret these sounds and identify diseases associated with certain patterns, its effective use is limited to individual experience of practitioners. This user-dependency manifests itself as a factor impeding the digital transformation of this valuable diagnostic tool, which can improve patient outcomes by continuous long-term respiratory monitoring under real-life conditions. Particularly patients suffering from respiratory diseases with progressive nature, such as chronic obstructive pulmonary diseases, are expected to benefit from long-term monitoring. Recently, the COVID-19 pandemic has also shown the lack of respiratory monitoring systems which are ready to deploy in operational conditions while requiring minimal patient education. To address particularly the latter subject, in this article, we present a sound acquisition module which can be integrated into a dedicated garment; thus, minimizing the role of the patient for positioning the stethoscope and applying the appropriate pressure. We have implemented a diaphragm-less acousto-electric transducer by stacking a silicone rubber and a piezoelectric film to capture thoracic sounds with minimum attenuation. Furthermore, we benchmarked our device with an electronic stethoscope widely used in clinical practice to quantify its performance.

Indexed as

BetacoronavirusStethoscopesWearable Electronic DevicesAcousticsAuscultationClinical Laboratory TechniquesCoronavirus InfectionsCOVID-19COVID-19 TestingElectric ImpedanceEquipment DesignHumansMonitoring, AmbulatoryPandemicsPneumonia, ViralRemote Sensing TechnologyauscultationCOPDdigital healthelectronic stethoscoperespiratory soundwearables

Identifiers

PMID32911861
PMCPMC7571051
OpenAlexW3084408842

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.