Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32911785›Full record

ArticleInsects2020

Trait Variation in Moths Mirrors Small-Scaled Ecological Gradients in A Tropical Forest Landscape.

Dominik Rabl, Aura M Alonso-Rodríguez, Gunnar Brehm, Konrad Fiedler

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Insects, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Dominik RablDepartment of Botany & Biodiversity Research, University of Vienna, Rennweg 14, A-1030 Vienna, Austria.
Aura M Alonso-RodríguezThe Gund Institute for Environment & Rubenstein School of Environment and Natural Resources, University of Vermont, Burlington, VT 05405, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-6500-9503
Gunnar BrehmInstitut für Zoologie und Evolutionsforschung, Phyletisches Museum, D-07743 Jena, Germany.
Konrad FiedlerDepartment of Botany & Biodiversity Research, University of Vienna, Rennweg 14, A-1030 Vienna, Austria.ORCID 0000-0002-4789-3753

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Along environmental gradients, communities are expected to be filtered from the regional species pool by physical constraints, resource availability, and biotic interactions. This should be reflected in species trait composition. Using data on species-rich moth assemblages sampled by light traps in a lowland rainforest landscape in Costa Rica, we show that moths in two unrelated clades (Erebidae-Arctiinae; Geometridae) are much smaller-sized in oil palm plantations than in nearby old-growth forest, with intermediate values at disturbed forest sites. In old-growth forest, Arctiinae predominantly show aposematic coloration as a means of anti-predator defense, whereas this trait is much reduced in the prevalence in plantations. Similarly, participation in Müllerian mimicry rings with Hymenoptera and Lycidae beetles, respectively, is rare in plantations. Across three topographic types of old-growth forests, community-weighted means of moth traits showed little variation, but in creek forest, both types of mimicry were surprisingly rare. Our results emphasize that despite their mobility, moth assemblages are strongly shaped by local environmental conditions through the interplay of bottom-up and top-down processes. Assemblages in oil palm plantations are highly degraded not only in their biodiversity, but also in terms of trait expression.

Indexed as

aposematismbody sizeCosta Ricalowland rainforestmimicry ringsoil palm plantations

Identifiers

PMID32911785
PMCPMC7563231

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.