ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2020
Leveraging Wearable Sensors for Human Daily Activity Recognition with Stacked Denoising Autoencoders.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed.
- Machine and Deep Learning for Detection of Moderate-to-Vigorous Physical Activity From Accelerometer Data: Systematic Scoping Review.Interactive journal of medical research · 2026Review
- Human bioimpedance-based state detection technologies for sports health monitoring: a review.Frontiers in physiology · 2026Review
- Exploring the Impact of theSensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Optimization system for training efficiency and load balance based on the fusion of heart rate and inertial sensors.Preventive medicine reports · 2024Article
- Hybrid convolution neural network with channel attention mechanism for sensor-based human activity recognition.Scientific reports · 2023Article
- Human activity recognition of children with wearable devices using LightGBM machine learning.Scientific reports · 2022Article
- Comparing Sampling Strategies for Tackling Imbalanced Data in Human Activity Recognition.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Body Temperature Monitoring for Regular COVID-19 Prevention Based on Human Daily Activity Recognition.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Article
- LSTM Networks Using Smartphone Data for Sensor-Based Human Activity Recognition in Smart Homes.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Article
- Smartphone Motion Sensor-Based Complex Human Activity Identification Using Deep Stacked Autoencoder Algorithm for Enhanced Smart Healthcare System.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020Article
- Empirical Mode Decomposition Based Multi-Modal Activity Recognition.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Activity recognition has received considerable attention in many research fields, such as industrial and healthcare fields. However, many researches about activity recognition have focused on static activities and dynamic activities in current literature, while, the transitional activities, such as stand-to-sit and sit-to-stand, are more difficult to recognize than both of them. Consider that it may be important in real applications. Thus, a novel framework is proposed in this paper to recognize static activities, dynamic activities, and transitional activities by utilizing stacked denoising autoencoders (SDAE), which is able to extract features automatically as a deep learning model rather than utilize manual features extracted by conventional machine learning methods. Moreover, the resampling technique (random oversampling) is used to improve problem of unbalanced samples due to relatively short duration characteristic of transitional activity. The experiment protocol is designed to collect twelve daily activities (three types) by using wearable sensors from 10 adults in smart lab of Ulster University, the experiment results show the significant performance on transitional activity recognition and achieve the overall accuracy of 94.88% on three types of activities. The results obtained by comparing with other methods and performances on other three public datasets verify the feasibility and priority of our framework. This paper also explores the effect of multiple sensors (accelerometer and gyroscope) to determine the optimal combination for activity recognition.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.