Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32911763›Full record

ArticleMetabolites2020

Lipidomic UPLC-MS/MS Profiles of Normal-Appearing White Matter Differentiate Primary and Secondary Progressive Multiple Sclerosis.

Petros Pousinis, Ines R Ramos, M Nicola Woodroofe, Laura M Cole

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Metabolites, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 37% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Petros PousinisBiomolecular Sciences Research Centre, Faculty of Health, Wellbeing and Life Sciences, Sheffield Hallam University, Sheffield S1 1WB, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-0049-3066
Ines R RamosLeicester School of Allied Health Sciences, Faculty of Health and Life Science, De Montfort University Leicester, Leicester LE1 9BH, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-0142-1224
M Nicola WoodroofeBiomolecular Sciences Research Centre, Faculty of Health, Wellbeing and Life Sciences, Sheffield Hallam University, Sheffield S1 1WB, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-8818-331X
Laura M ColeBiomolecular Sciences Research Centre, Faculty of Health, Wellbeing and Life Sciences, Sheffield Hallam University, Sheffield S1 1WB, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-2538-6291
Sheffield Hallam University · GBDe Montfort University · GB

Funding

National Multiple Sclerosis Society RG-1706-27701
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Multiple sclerosis (MS) is a neurodegenerative inflammatory disease where an autoimmune response to components of the central nervous system leads to a loss of myelin and subsequent neurological deterioration. People with MS can develop primary or secondary progressive disease (PPMS, SPMS) and differentiation of the specific differences in the pathogenesis of these two courses, at the molecular level, is currently unclear. Recently, lipidomics studies using human biofluids, mainly plasma and cerebrospinal fluid, have highlighted a possible role for lipids in the initiation and progression of MS. However, there is a lack of lipidomics studies in MS on CNS tissues, such as normal-appearing white matter (NAWM), where local inflammation initially occurs. Herein, we developed an untargeted reverse phase ultra-performance liquid chromatography time of flight tandem mass spectrometry (RP-UPLC-TOF MS

Indexed as

glycerophospholipidslipidomicsmultiple sclerosisneurodegenerationprogression

Identifiers

PMID32911763
PMCPMC7569864
OpenAlexW3083934044

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.