ReviewPolymers2020
A Review on Micro- to Nanocellulose Biopolymer Scaffold Forming for Tissue Engineering Applications.
Review in Polymers, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 34 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
34 citing papers in PubMed, 139 citations in OpenAlex.
- Eco-Friendly Cellulose-Based Aerogels From Posidonia oceanica Waste: Effect of Microcellulose Extraction Route and Natural Biopolymers on Adsorption Performance.Chemistry & biodiversity · 2026Article
- Smart Nanofibers in Wound Healing: Exploring Novel Combinations and Applications.Current drug delivery · 2026Review
- Article
- Review
- Kombucha Versus Vegetal Cellulose for Affordable Mucoadhesive (nano)Formulations.Gels (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Protein and Polysaccharide Fibers via Air Jet Spinning: Emerging Techniques for Biomedical and Sustainable Applications.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024Review
- Advancements in wound management: integrating nanotechnology and smart materials for enhanced therapeutic interventions.Discover nano · 2024Review
- 3D printing tissue-engineered scaffolds for auricular reconstruction.Materials today. Bio · 2024Review
- 3D-Printed Poly(3-hydroxybutyrate-Biomacromolecules · 2023Article
- Biological Macromolecule-Based Scaffolds for Urethra Reconstruction.Biomolecules · 2023Review
- Nanostructured Bioaerogels as a Potential Solution for Particulate Matter Pollution.Gels (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
- Article
- Nanofiber Scaffolds as Drug Delivery Systems Promoting Wound Healing.Pharmaceutics · 2023Review
- Cellulose and Lignin-Derived Scaffold and Their Biological Application in Tissue Engineering, Drug Delivery, and Wound Healing: A Review.Cell journal · 2023Article
- The Fabrication of Gelatin-Elastin-Nanocellulose Composite Bioscaffold as a Potential Acellular Skin Substitute.Polymers · 2023Article
- Toxicological Assessment of Cellulose Nanomaterials: Oral Exposure.Nanomaterials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Review
- Review
- An Electroconductive, Thermosensitive, and Injectable Chitosan/Pluronic/Gold-Decorated Cellulose Nanofiber Hydrogel as an Efficient Carrier for Regeneration of Cardiac Tissue.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Advances in Cellulose-Based Hydrogels for Biomedical Engineering: A Review Summary.Gels (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Review
- Cellulose-Based Nanomaterials Advance Biomedicine: A Review.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors at 5 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
Abstract
Biopolymers have been used as a replacement material for synthetic polymers in scaffold forming due to its biocompatibility and nontoxic properties. Production of scaffold for tissue repair is a major part of tissue engineering. Tissue engineering techniques for scaffold forming with cellulose-based material is at the forefront of present-day research. Micro- and nanocellulose-based materials are at the forefront of scientific development in the areas of biomedical engineering. Cellulose in scaffold forming has attracted a lot of attention because of its availability and toxicity properties. The discovery of nanocellulose has further improved the usability of cellulose as a reinforcement in biopolymers intended for scaffold fabrication. Its unique physical, chemical, mechanical, and biological properties offer some important advantages over synthetic polymer materials. This review presents a critical overview of micro- and nanoscale cellulose-based materials used for scaffold preparation. It also analyses the relationship between the method of fabrication and properties of the fabricated scaffold. The review concludes with future potential research on cellulose micro- and nano-based scaffolds. The review provides an up-to-date summary of the status and future prospective applications of micro- and nanocellulose-based scaffolds for tissue engineering.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.