ArticlePLoS computational biology2020
Ten quick tips for teaching with participatory live coding.
Article in PLoS computational biology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Ten simple rules for teaching data science.PLoS computational biology · 2026Article
- Ten simple rules for teaching an introduction to R.PLoS computational biology · 2024Article
- Motivation, inclusivity, and realism should drive data science education.F1000Research · 2023Article
- Ten simple rules to cultivate belonging in collaborative data science research teams.PLoS computational biology · 2022Article
- The experience of teaching introductory programming skills to bioscientists in Brazil.PLoS computational biology · 2021Article
- Teaching Python for Data Science: Collaborative development of a modular & interactive curriculum.The Journal of open source education · 2021Article
- Bridging the Python Training Gap for Bioscientists in Brazil: Improvements and Challenges.Biochemistry and molecular biology education : a bimonthly publication of the International Union of Biochemistry and Molecular BiologyArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.