Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32911491›Full record

ArticlePLoS genetics2020

Genetic analysis of the modern Australian labradoodle dog breed reveals an excess of the poodle genome.

Muhammad Basil Ali, Jacquelyn M Evans, Heidi G Parker, Jaemin Kim, Susan Pearce-Kelling, D Thad Whitaker, Jocelyn Plassais, Qaiser M Khan, Elaine A Ostrander

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS genetics, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Best practices for analyzing imputed genotypes from low-pass sequencing in dogs.Mammalian genome : official journal of the International Mammalian Genome Society · 2022
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Muhammad Basil AliCancer Genetics and Comparative Genomics Branch, National Human Genome Research Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda MD, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0003-4581-0165
Jacquelyn M EvansCancer Genetics and Comparative Genomics Branch, National Human Genome Research Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda MD, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0003-1272-0059
Heidi G ParkerCancer Genetics and Comparative Genomics Branch, National Human Genome Research Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda MD, United States of America.
Jaemin KimCancer Genetics and Comparative Genomics Branch, National Human Genome Research Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda MD, United States of America.
Susan Pearce-KellingOptiGen, LLC Cornell Business and Technology Park, Ithaca, NY, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0003-1247-701X
D Thad WhitakerCancer Genetics and Comparative Genomics Branch, National Human Genome Research Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda MD, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-7697-2776
Jocelyn PlassaisCancer Genetics and Comparative Genomics Branch, National Human Genome Research Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda MD, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-2112-1595
Qaiser M KhanNational Institute for Biotechnology and Genetic Engineering (NIBGE), Jhang Road Faisalabad, Punjab, Pakistan.
Elaine A OstranderCancer Genetics and Comparative Genomics Branch, National Human Genome Research Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda MD, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0001-6075-9738
National Institutes of Health · USCornell University · USNational Institute for Biotechnology and Genetic Engineering · PK

Funding

Simultaneous identification of germline and somatic mutations associated with histiocytic sarcoma in a canine modelFI2GM133344 · NIGMS · NATIONAL HUMAN GENOME RESEARCH INST · PI EVANS, JACQUELYN · 2019 to 2019
–
NIGMS NIH HHS FI2 GM133344
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The genomic diversity of the domestic dog is an invaluable resource for advancing understanding of mammalian biology, evolutionary biology, morphologic variation, and behavior. There are approximately 350 recognized breeds in the world today, many established through hybridization and selection followed by intense breeding programs aimed at retaining or enhancing specific traits. As a result, many breeds suffer from an excess of particular diseases, one of many factors leading to the recent trend of "designer breed" development, i.e. crossing purebred dogs from existing breeds in the hope that offspring will be enriched for desired traits and characteristics of the parental breeds. We used a dense panel of 150,106 SNPs to analyze the population structure of the Australian labradoodle (ALBD), to understand how such breeds are developed. Haplotype and admixture analyses show that breeds other than the poodle (POOD) and Labrador retriever (LAB) contributed to ALBD formation, but that the breed is, at the genetic level, predominantly POOD, with all small and large varieties contributing to its construction. Allele frequency analysis reveals that the breed is enhanced for variants associated with a poodle-like coat, which is perceived by breeders to have an association with hypoallergenicity. We observed little enhancement for LAB-specific alleles. This study provides a blueprint for understanding how dog breeds are formed, highlighting the limited scope of desired traits in defining new breeds.

Indexed as

AllelesAnimalsAnimals, DomesticAustraliaBreedingDogsGene FrequencyGenetic TestingGenetic VariationGenomicsGenotypeHaplotypesPhenotypePhylogenySelection, Genetic

Identifiers

PMID32911491
PMCPMC7482835
OpenAlexW3084969170

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC0
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.